X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3EB5289B for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:11:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06009-10 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:11:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from boutiquenumerique.com (boutiquenumerique.com [82.67.9.10]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD1B52834 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:11:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 9813 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2005 17:11:37 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (boutiquenumerique-lists@192.168.0.4) by boutiquenumerique.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2005 17:11:37 +0200 Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:11:31 +0200 To: "Casey Allen Shobe" , "Postgresql Performance" Subject: Re: Performance nightmare with dspam (urgent) (resolved) References: <200506012019.13218.cshobe@seattleserver.com> <200506061454.48018.lists@seattleserver.com> From: PFC Organization: =?iso-8859-15?Q?La_Boutique_Num=E9rique?= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200506061454.48018.lists@seattleserver.com> User-Agent: Opera M2(BETA2)/8.0 (Linux, build 987) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/110 X-Sequence-Number: 12747 > PostgreSQL and say to use MySQL if you want reasonable performance. If you want MySQL performance and reliability with postgres, simply run it with fsync deactivated ;) I'd suggest a controller with battery backed up cache to get rid of the 1 commit = 1 seek boundary. > Makes it > real fun to be a DSpam+PostgreSQL user when limits are reached, since > everyone denies responsibility. Fortunately, PostgreSQL people are > pretty > helpful even if they think the client software sucks. :) > > Cheers,