X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DD052939
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:15:17 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 92395-04
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:15:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from boutiquenumerique.com (boutiquenumerique.com [82.67.9.10])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6850552924
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:15:14 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 22982 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2005 20:15:28 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (boutiquenumerique-lists@192.168.0.4)
	by boutiquenumerique.com with SMTP; 10 Aug 2005 20:15:28 +0200
To: "Tobias Brox" <tobias@nordicbet.com>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: partial index regarded more expensive
References: <20050810175208.GD6141@tobias.lan>
Message-ID: <op.sva0znchth1vuj@localhost>
From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
Organization: =?iso-8859-15?Q?La_Boutique_Num=E9rique?=
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:15:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20050810175208.GD6141@tobias.lan>
User-Agent: Opera M2/8.0 (Linux, build 1095)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.005 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200508/97
X-Sequence-Number: 13844


	why not simply create an index on (game_end, state) ?