To: "Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace@earthlink.net>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Advice on RAID card
References: 
 <5559818.1127577353936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <op.sxl70aadth1vuj@localhost>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:27:36 +0200
From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
Organization: =?iso-8859-15?Q?La_Boutique_Num=E9rique?=
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <5559818.1127577353936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Opera M2/8.0 (Linux, build 1095)


> It looks like a rebranded low end Adaptec 64MB PCI-X <-> SATA RAID card.
> Looks like the 64MB buffer is not upgradable.
> Looks like it's SATA, not SATA II

	Yeah, that's exactly what it is. I can get one for 150 Euro, the Areca is  
at least 600. This is for a budget server so while it would be nice to  
have all the high-tech stuff, it's not the point. My question was raher,  
is it one of the crap RAID5 cards which are actually SLOWER than plain IDE  
disks, or is it decent, even though low-end (and cheap), and worth it  
compared to software RAID5 ?

> Assuming you are not building 1U boxes, get one of the full height
> cards and order it with the maximum size buffer you can afford.
> The cards take 1 SODIMM, so that will be a max of 1GB or 2GB
> depending on whether 2GB SODIMMs are available to you yet.

	It's for a budget dev server which should have RAID5 for reliability, but  
not necessarily stellar performance (and price). I asked about this card  
because I can get one at a good price.

	Thanks for taking the time to answer.