Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E546632697 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:02:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49325-02 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:02:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com (mail-ww0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5330263267F for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:02:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so150820wwb.19 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1IHYPD6J2JS/0A22yg8tPbD4dFrljdtLG5XVA9VgPXI=; b=MwiWll1kSsHhUD9pnGv4kY4w2/q9W6vRlUMn6FRYHO1hwJtKJ3FBOR1VXf84jMpGbP yIypgp7TF4+x/sl98Cxt+HNuWYxMjIlDFNA4BvtnzSH0ggJp9RPV3DzDTxxsqsuCNSQv cuQSTvmR2x7wB1At8+EBmQ9F6RjyxAELZVXZ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=q8hror8GJsUYbNqmfVcvVBgzOkR21lmD+GzqzcNKPDuGvQgpMGak8q47aVzIhGkCRM nNtJkzffN6FB0Tc1rMiqDMAxz72Ceju5EOe9PeTKbh84vSSUo/HOiXHggnDub/Q4+sh8 0H2GFteOxr6lQBj0G7zS4j26IuTZM6i6XBGC0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.3 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:02:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BBF4FDD.3090008@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:02:01 +0200 Received: by 10.216.86.71 with SMTP id v49mr5507327wee.14.1271271721344; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: PostgreSQL with Zabbix - problem of newbe From: Krzysztof Kardas To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=B6kiewicz?= Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.133 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.134, BAYES_40=-0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/176 X-Sequence-Number: 38426 W dniu 14 kwietnia 2010 15:30 u=BFytkownik Grzegorz Ja=B6kiewicz napisa=B3: > That really sounds like hardware issue. The I/O causes the system to free= ze > basically. > Happens sometimes on cheaper hardware. > Probably You have right because this is HS21 Blade Server. And as You know blades are cheap and good. Why blades are good - because they are cheap (quoting IBM salesman). I know this hardware is not made for databases but for now I do not have any other server. Firmware on this current server is very old and it should be upgraded and there are many other things to do. VMWare machines (currently I have ESX 3.5, vSphere 4 is based od 64bit RedHat5 system and is much faster that 3.5 but migration process is not even planned) has still to low performance for database solutions (of course in using vmdk, not RAW device mapping or Virtual WWN solution for accessing LUN-s). As more I am reading than more I see that the file system is wrong partitioned. For example - all logs and database files are on the same volume, and that is not right. Kevin Grittner also mentioned about write back function on the controller. LSI controllers for blades has that function as far as I know. I have to check it if that option is turned on. As I mentioned - I am not familiar with databases so I have made some mistakes but I am very happy for the effects how fast now Zabbix works, and how easy PostgreSQL reclaims space. I think it was a good decision and maybe I will try to interest some people in my company in PostgreSQL instate of Oracle XE. Once more time - many thanks to all :) --=20 Greetings Krzysztof Kardas