public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Messages from [email protected] Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables 2018-04-20 15:32 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: proposal: schema variables 2017-11-02 17:21 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: proposal: schema variables 2017-11-02 12:35 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: PATCH: adaptive ndistinct estimator v4 2015-05-15 19:58 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: PATCH: adaptive ndistinct estimator v4 2015-05-15 18:30 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: PATCH: adaptive ndistinct estimator v4 2015-05-01 11:55 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: PATCH: adaptive ndistinct estimator v4 2015-04-30 22:18 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: PATCH: adaptive ndistinct estimator v4 2015-04-30 20:57 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-23 02:22 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Does auto-analyze work on dirty writes? 2011-02-10 17:51 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-10 17:19 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-10 17:02 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-10 15:50 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-05 06:37 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-04 18:48 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-04 02:05 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-04 01:36 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-04 01:29 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-04 00:08 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-03 23:29 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-03 17:28 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-03 15:35 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-03 15:31 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-03 02:01 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-02 18:32 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-02 18:20 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... 2011-02-02 17:19 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences 2011-01-20 15:25 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2011-01-20 14:19 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: UNION and bad performance 2010-12-20 18:57 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Strange optimization - xmin,xmax compression :) 2010-12-18 02:46 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows 2010-12-17 23:49 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows 2010-12-17 17:37 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Tunning Postgres 2010-12-13 23:06 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow 2010-12-13 03:30 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [PERFORM] Slow BLOBs restoring 2010-12-09 15:56 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [PERFORM] Slow BLOBs restoring 2010-12-09 13:05 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-09 01:41 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-08 21:09 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-08 04:24 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-08 04:23 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-07 18:10 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-07 18:09 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-07 17:37 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-06 19:07 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Performance under contention 2010-12-06 17:10 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: executor stats / page reclaims 2010-12-03 17:16 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: MVCC performance issue 2010-11-30 00:21 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: postmaster consuming /lots/ of memory with hash aggregate. why? 2010-11-24 03:11 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Query Performance SQL Server vs. Postgresql 2010-11-21 18:55 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? 2010-11-17 03:07 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? 2010-11-16 23:10 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Difference between explain analyze and real execution time 2010-11-15 19:39 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences 2010-11-15 19:36 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences 2010-11-15 15:06 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Why dose the planner select one bad scan plan. 2010-11-14 23:00 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans 2010-11-14 02:54 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans 2010-11-14 00:46 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-14 00:20 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: questions regarding shared_buffers behavior 2010-11-12 21:07 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-12 18:57 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-12 16:30 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-11 20:29 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-11 19:05 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-11 19:02 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-11 17:57 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-11 03:47 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 2010-11-10 22:07 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Regression: 8.3 2 seconds -> 8.4 100+ seconds 2010-11-07 01:23 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump 2010-10-30 00:24 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump 2010-10-29 21:48 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump 2010-10-29 19:15 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans 2010-10-29 18:16 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Fwd: failure notice 2010-10-29 18:13 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles 2010-10-29 16:44 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles 2010-10-29 15:43 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Query much faster with enable_seqscan=0 2010-10-28 16:21 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles 2010-10-28 01:55 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles 2010-10-26 14:25 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles 2010-10-26 12:41 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Auto ANALYZE criteria 2010-10-26 12:24 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Slow count(*) again... 2010-10-14 19:56 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Slow count(*) again... 2010-10-14 02:18 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Slow count(*) again... 2010-10-13 13:28 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Slow count(*) again... 2010-10-13 13:27 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Slow count(*) again... 2010-10-13 06:45 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: How does PG know if data is in memory? 2010-10-13 06:40 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field 2010-10-12 12:36 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: How does PG know if data is in memory? 2010-10-12 12:34 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: How does PG know if data is in memory? 2010-10-12 02:59 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: gist indexes for distance calculations 2010-10-12 00:52 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance 2010-10-07 20:31 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: On Scalability 2010-10-07 13:30 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance 2010-10-07 12:33 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance 2010-10-07 02:01 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance 2010-10-07 00:39 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance 2010-10-04 17:47 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance 2010-10-04 17:13 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Query much faster with enable_seqscan=0 2010-09-28 16:03 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: how to enforce index sub-select over filter+seqscan 2010-09-27 17:30 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Is disableing nested_loops a bad idea ? 2010-09-26 04:02 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Useless sort by 2010-09-23 04:46 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Useless sort by 2010-09-23 00:54 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Using Between 2010-09-22 16:27 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Using Between 2010-09-22 10:51 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: Using Between 2010-09-21 19:35 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> Re: On Scalability 2010-07-30 20:39 UTC Robert Haas <[email protected]> 107+ results
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox