Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 18:41:07 +0100
From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
	DUVAL REMI <REMI.DUVAL@cheops.fr>,
 PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Message-ID: <ssk7uqvu7rirq4vl4ns7vvr5efvgqwpuonu3qpfl6tem7ypifw@jchzp34fhqje>
References: 
 <CAFj8pRA6nJRg8oq5k_Cdk5oH5_FjtViG8XLmHKrkqOuiMT_CKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRBWMLP3Vyr8z+19eaiJKQoVtBfmDhNJFKXDX6uFzd4vBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <c7eee33c5051f973ab256ee7202c15771c33f47d.camel@cybertec.at>
 <afb4e296d7ce57986f23bcfdee39b259b8f85f56.camel@cybertec.at>
 <CAFj8pRAjU-X6rEE9=1++PdtXOPc2uo=yu-tcFXByi-kN3B_7Vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRC+hPCc2X88xC=pTJoqmVPApDsageZOMyqaxi5788WxHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRDJ9cq00VYSHxs6LsoHNWjhYXyWWBtV6UgeWwhs0AHa9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRBPXTcw_3fpKtgVthV2+9rZGhxitZ40DnAwCrK601TZZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ndtfl4tsnpkb7m7hwvnmlpsascpgd3a7xvjmjhtxffsbrgygtm@4du6zsmnnwq5>
 <CAFj8pRAu4XvNCGu1751t=2YEqLqTjDA3FavMExm2S0KYQq=DdQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFj8pRAu4XvNCGu1751t=2YEqLqTjDA3FavMExm2S0KYQq=DdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ssk7uqvu7rirq4vl4ns7vvr5efvgqwpuonu3qpfl6tem7ypifw%40jchzp34fhqje>
Precedence: bulk

> On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 05:19:09PM GMT, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> ne 10. 11. 2024 v 16:24 odesílatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
> napsal:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to mention
> > how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand correctly,
> > there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with recent
> > patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g. the
> > main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn't even
> > mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in one
> > thread?
> >
>
> This is probably my error. I don't try to organize threads, just I'll try
> to reply in the thread where I got a question.

It's fine. I just would appreciate some clarity about which patch to
look at. To confirm, the series in this thread contains everything from
the other one, plus some improvements, right?