Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52731635589 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:58:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36891-01-5 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:58:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com (mail-gw0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37156346AB for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:48:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so79393gwb.19 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:48:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b7DOtapTMHTq34EJLIJ51lDYDmihZmvA7Q9uEKLLyPE=; b=wCEuhwS0bugtKbi6okPcnTDSMTv/sAIoKrx4bO7NCp7G0uJIUA26wVy5X/7WXGDI01 nj88zGhM4MK2bQeOhnvkk9ZDcQq7Ip8b5jHQ48W9n6zevMVS9CvNjjdUMNgwBYN36AJA n8FzORgF5FDUdsYbQWRiAV9X21PWPbmycGTug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hiFyKC27TRVbsMikWiEQ+RbL5WNzXqxgLSw3GjVHwN3N0Bv3GCra9vovwXPgGTfTQV 6xLqxYbzMxXV4yy5mg9M9zMGHEMFVQlNYNIiAqD7dfbNVJhWKYmKhdjdklS4FolN/1i7 ejvk2qY58H1s1BWY8rbH+vHQCnbrgJBjN5bYI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.108.2 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:48:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:48:32 -0600 Received: by 10.150.75.8 with SMTP id x8mr8238479yba.121.1270579712158; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using high speed swap to improve performance? From: Scott Marlowe To: Lew Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/58 X-Sequence-Number: 38308 On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Lew wrote: > Christiaan Willemsen wrote: >> >> About a year ago we setup a machine with sixteen 15k disk spindles on >> Solaris using ZFS. Now that Oracle has taken Sun, and is closing up Solaris, >> we want to move away (we are more familiar with Linux anyway). > > What evidence do you have that Oracle is "closing up" Solaris? I don't think the other poster mean shutting down solaris, that would be insane. I think he meant closing it, as in taking it closed source, which there is ample evidence for.