Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dG5zy-0002ph-2I for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:57:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dG5zx-0005SJ-LX for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:57:25 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dG5zx-0005RJ-0a for pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:57:25 +0000 Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dG5zt-0004TK-4g for pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:57:24 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id t26so15634744qtg.0 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 08:57:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iHGD3b3ee1zWZqzw2PfywG5voDtEXa10HX/EAlrZ26Y=; b=R69oSq3XBfSoJ4tpqhXRIOKimCDi3qyJT6KvVANWg70wAKEhGrt77m1ZAlTr+DMht3 8IpzTGhRFUB5owP47HvcSxNUM99ndp6mluHUwNrhERp/JkilrP1iGeFCyla0snZIVGPY 1khubhQQSU/ihzyfJ9+KUlkIBnLVX4Ths9Ghjtjlbl49zhcX5XRntJ10yX6ZzLraKx7+ SzSrnN8mM9nNnN/Me5AZwjKgVvpElozUCX74crlwtwtRngnBk1fIp+zDmF5efaD2ry0t kNPMdM27c0ruY2fkrWXldAXwSdIOO1WVMNZVSp+HXwTNwGZhohkP68AVwojH6oLTwoTF YPZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=iHGD3b3ee1zWZqzw2PfywG5voDtEXa10HX/EAlrZ26Y=; b=PlgfBPomP1dLHNo00HrFwu7Ws5YOaTnd2k1c68NZNJ9Uu40oGkU9Qc5OtgGFzc9ijQ vdXqYdDDxyEVz/oFVY8FAJHgTuVdrbPNO/9Hqi4oLUm95NQVcIPfvvzq0fMd2aM5NMsS ZMvnIX0G7arfwIEv415eKEGD9cLBcS7VnE7qPORPYsmvh6SuWKMCDlyjCkbPEOMeI5wv jTCoHcSYO3wpW0GsG2xxSG/gdrdGRbzqZHCYk5PUBmky9osJuIBFqYnsDoPAUkaxOQ+q e1b6mnFaBZqZJxZXAjPvDY0CpqAgGSu5ZmSpV3PlEsNTuP65DDfF6rinvHIqQV2WETPP XLmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCaLEq2JIpmoxzVGs2cj5cEbmh21181513Ky6Fng4+3XoAMf+rV ivLd/+eA//Gbf8kB X-Received: by 10.237.36.154 with SMTP id t26mr30050446qtc.180.1496246239078; Wed, 31 May 2017 08:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org ([179.57.115.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h21sm8376576qke.52.2017.05.31.08.57.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 May 2017 08:57:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A10D8442; Wed, 31 May 2017 11:57:16 -0400 (-04) Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:57:16 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Christoph Berg , Tom Lane , Andres Freund , Jason Petersen , pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x Message-ID: <20170531155716.p47mgds63inlgssg@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170531150940.2nqkexxm6sfz25ko@msg.df7cb.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306-137-4415bd-dirty (1.8.0) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-debian List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-debian-owner@postgresql.org Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Tom Lane 2017-05-31 <28752.1496238931@sss.pgh.pa.us> > > Next question: should we back-patch this change, or just do it in HEAD? > > Debian "needs" it for 9.6, but I've already pushed the s390x patch in > the original posting, so I could just live with it being just in head. > But of course it would be nice to have everything in sync. I think it's only a problem for you in 9.6-only because you've not tried pglogical or some other large-shlib extension with earlier branches; in other words, eventually this is going to bite somebody using the old branches as well, unless we believe that the platforms are dead enough that nobody really cares other than for academic purposes. My vote would be to backpatch it all the way. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-pkg-debian mailing list (pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-debian