Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:27:07 +0100
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: Michael =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6hm?= <dudleyperkins@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: postgis update from 2.5 to 3
Message-ID: <20191113122707.GB3741@msg.df7cb.de>
References: 
 <CAKJYtEQVW=V3wG9wX4nBoX9Rqti3PfJ7qANNdjO5ztF_3JyZSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191112143958.GC20731@msg.df7cb.de>
 <CAKJYtETxgMiGze5hcjhgGOy_4B4wh8YfL6nnKE_UxkwO6iFwjA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKJYtETxgMiGze5hcjhgGOy_4B4wh8YfL6nnKE_UxkwO6iFwjA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

Re: Michael Böhm 2019-11-13 <CAKJYtETxgMiGze5hcjhgGOy_4B4wh8YfL6nnKE_UxkwO6iFwjA@mail.gmail.com>
> > Interesting... I would have thought that upgrading didn't need the old
> > files.
> >
> 
> Well it looked like this:
> 
> edugis=# SELECT PostGIS_full_version();
> FEHLER:  konnte nicht auf Datei »$libdir/postgis-2.5« zugreifen: Datei oder
> Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
> KONTEXT:  SQL-Anweisung »SELECT public.postgis_lib_version()«
> PL/pgSQL-Funktion postgis_full_version() Zeile 26 bei SQL-Anweisung

Ok, that's missing the old *libs*, that's somewhat expected.

> > Which versions of the -2.5 and -3 packages exactly did you use?
> >
> 
> Well i always try to update asap so before i had:
> ii  postgresql-10-postgis-2.5            2.5.3+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1
> ii  postgresql-10-postgis-2.5-scripts    2.5.3+dfsg-2.pgdg100+1
> and now
> ii  postgresql-10-postgis-3              3.0.0+dfsg-2~exp1.pgdg100+1
> ii  postgresql-10-postgis-3-scripts      3.0.0+dfsg-2~exp1.pgdg100+1

Thanks, I'll see what I can do about the file conflicts. It will
likely take until next week, however.

Christoph