Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 13:41:45 +0100
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org"
 <pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture
Message-ID: <20200316124145.GB2250185@msg.df7cb.de>
References: 
 <CAJ3gD9ezKiUgcZDjbUa4svn3A+M_r6QvgOVmarA2aoDR9i+iLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200313090537.GA2216066@msg.df7cb.de>
 <CAJ3gD9e2Q9MQxa3DTbS8Jo9D_3GTKrWHyzQvqRuypHBX-=uUkA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJ3gD9e2Q9MQxa3DTbS8Jo9D_3GTKrWHyzQvqRuypHBX-=uUkA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Re: Amit Khandekar 2020-03-16 <CAJ3gD9e2Q9MQxa3DTbS8Jo9D_3GTKrWHyzQvqRuypHBX-=uUkA@mail.gmail.com>
> So, when we see that there are N number of OS/architecture
> combinations for which PGDG does not provide packages, is it so
> because we don't have dedicated machines satisfying the minumum
> requirements like RAM/core/disk ? In other words, is it only a matter
> of providing such machine and adding it up in the buildfarm members
> where it passes the regression tests, or there are are some more
> requirements over and above the machine resource requirements after
> which PGDG can officially support those OS/architecture combinations ?

The buildfarm machines have nothing to do with the build daemons
behind apt.postgresql.org or yum.postgresql.org; they are entirely
different infrastructure.

I guess asking the buildfarm operators if they can spare machines as
build daemons might work, but I haven't had the time to dig into that.
If you care about a specific architecture, it would be nice if you
could arrange that.

Christoph