Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mOLgq-0002Dp-NX for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 15:10:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mOLgp-0006RO-JV for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 15:10:11 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mOLfy-0004Re-Sq for pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 15:09:18 +0000 Received: from mx.huehner.biz ([52.29.210.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mOLfu-00036p-La for pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 15:09:17 +0000 Received: from huehner.biz (unknown [52.28.21.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.huehner.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2CDC211DB; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by huehner.biz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C1B2A61D58; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:15:08 +0000 From: Stefan Huehner To: Christoph Berg , pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org Subject: Re: apt.postgresql.org repo via https will fail will some users starting 2021-10-01 Message-ID: <20210909151508.GE6114@huehner.biz> References: <20210908164806.GC6114@huehner.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:33:49PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Stefan Huehner > > sending this here as looks like https://apt.postgresql.org is affected by this so this could trigger some support/user questions. > > > > Note this only (!) happens when using https:// in sources.list for the pgdg repo. > > Hi, > > thanks for sharing this. > > We aren't advertising https:// for apt.postgresql.org anywhere, but > the download instructions tell users to "wget" the repository key from > https://www.postgresql.org, so we are at least somewhat affected. > (wget is using gnutls at least in unstable.) > > > Ideas: > > - Do nothing apt.postgresql suggest http:// in the instructions > > - Some on the website > > - Think on reconfiguring certbot/Let's Encrypt on the server to switch to the alternative chain (avoiding this bug but breaking compatibility with old Android > > That's probably rather the ca-certificates package? Not in this case, i know a bit confusing. That upstream article has more details: https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/openssl-client-compatibility-changes-for-let-s-encrypt-certificates/143816 Part: How to support older OpenSSL versions In (not so) short: ca-certificates is fine to have trust anchor for Lets Encrypt. However not everybody directly trust Let's Encrypt (missing entry in their equivalent of ca-certificates (i.e. old Android). To keep those other clients supported they employed a bit of a trick which has an 'expired root certificates' in the chain from your server-cert to their root. At the same time there is 2nd valid path. But old version of software (openssl,gnutls) just stop + fail on seeing 'expired'. Best they could do if offer server owner (certbot parameter when requesting ssl certificate to select): a.) Default chain (compatible still with old android) but triggering this bug b.) Alternative chain (ignore old android) but keep compatible with old openssl/gnutls That link goes into much more detail but hopefully now clearer. That is also why i raised this here as a choice for apt.postgresql.org hosting (if you think it's a useful workaround) > > > - Raise as bug to debian also (against openssl/gnutls) to maybe patch both in stable also to avoid this ? > > - Not sure if that is a interesting/acceptable material for stable/old-stable? > > If stretch/buster/bullseye are affected, these should be fixed, yes. > > Though none of this is material for the PostgreSQL packages, can you > raise the issue with the LTS team? Will raise there. Hopefuly above also clarified why i sent that here (not about any PostgreSQL package, but apt.postgresql.org server admin topic). Stefan