MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAAaqYe8ODM-Qsofh8E+stPqTMffLBwmZKU43mHJP+uN0eWJmrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZGSWHq/vxjGF7p4W@msg.df7cb.de>
In-Reply-To: <ZGSWHq/vxjGF7p4W@msg.df7cb.de>
From: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 10:34:04 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAAaqYe-GvHw7m5WEKE9HFGQ+bRRC+0WNWjp1T+nXfNHAkuxczw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Postgres 15.2 packages missing
To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe-GvHw7m5WEKE9HFGQ%2BbRRC%2B0WNWjp1T%2BnXfNHAkuxczw%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:53=E2=80=AFAM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wr=
ote:
>
> Re: James Coleman
> > Given the older versions are still present, we assume there isn't a
> > policy to yank point releases once the newest point release comes out,
> > but if so, please let us know.
>
> Hi,
>
> we actually keep only one version in the repository. The 15.0 and 15.1
> packages seem to be mistakenly kept around by reprepro, I'll have to
> investigate that.
>
> The packages you are looking for are available in the archive:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt/FAQ#Where_are_older_versions_of_the_=
packages.3F

Thanks. I had a vague memory of something like that, but then when I
saw the 15.0 and 15.1 packages I assumed I'd remembered incorrectly.

What's the reasoning for maintaining only the newest point release in the r=
epo?

Thanks,
James