Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jEB8r-0004VF-AM for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:16:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jEB8o-0000of-DQ for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:16:14 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jEB8o-0000oY-0V for pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:16:14 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x142.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::142]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jEB8l-0002a1-Ov for pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:16:12 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x142.google.com with SMTP id a28so5142675lfr.13 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 05:16:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GcTzRohLkWMSOkHVe/6cMLRfRrsAJTkij0qGTKDQynI=; b=Ib0OaZSiISePZXwY/j1CLD9WerkVLOtO8SKp3xNoiz3/5FSZXKMyX0+r9lZd39H3U5 /ixn1a8rIjcdB+E4NshKKpLDQvpl7hXIGZpazsc9ocPNX81va0UNJcwDLj0yOja5sCzx daKBAzvrO0+Txju4pzC7ssWIFBJbf08l4g8DT3AofCBBXdhqFHTGHM8JrDz6TImetPDt E4ouVmqCkDQJ+XNwE7cfDt6eY5XKB/o6chtRd1WzLFEnyVBUYvY35EVps8RwGsjuHv72 uqFkGAIfiLl1gyo6COHyzRG0QWmv+uJVxidNCAHGzKJWNeIAgT8oXoB7xvSoK1tq91lO U4mQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GcTzRohLkWMSOkHVe/6cMLRfRrsAJTkij0qGTKDQynI=; b=VZZZ8mu2x7njRkIMqtzb74Zl8GSCkDVHzuE/S8BpeXk5GFZOGM93YFBEVaAsNXYnWk PohXvupnNiBboRrpgjklzTnv8Fg275u4tY/q7gWqr2toI6d04mRm9dJUm2WcX/8y3hB3 7tlPSGRTWjAcjK3/WjYDLxKLppsQLWK6n5tWdazaHxD8iyBSF2DFRjhuH4AIG0vtxPig yyZrHfnHecLQppL+x9ckfSkBZn4EKINFOoDtQVDxU+eeLbKQE6kuBwx4tKxLnkc3KZ6p 6uOi4hh8NNUyE22jYIc8dA4MNgwK88ynSJa8eifaQAvM5iLB2n1jl7rcdCrtOUzozsG0 ZIeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ15aCYXI4zpvnyGNeb+o07E9cBQKKn5xNkQhA9s9WIz2px/bKZ3 VowzmC6TPCnfomzM5Q9PspTM2mZY4zSf8APg0yw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vthokl7Ze7DySB+Jfu7yMJTiPadFZb2YF97dRyDXA+zHQyFJjk3hgeOEdGFIrig9JPT3r2TBHxIZwYkN7zNaiw= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c502:: with SMTP id w2mr2701080lfe.121.1584447370104; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 05:16:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200313090537.GA2216066@msg.df7cb.de> <20200316124145.GB2250185@msg.df7cb.de> In-Reply-To: <20200316124145.GB2250185@msg.df7cb.de> From: Amit Khandekar Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:45:46 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: No PGDG package for ARM architecture To: Christoph Berg Cc: "pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 18:11, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Amit Khandekar 2020-03-16 > > So, when we see that there are N number of OS/architecture > > combinations for which PGDG does not provide packages, is it so > > because we don't have dedicated machines satisfying the minumum > > requirements like RAM/core/disk ? In other words, is it only a matter > > of providing such machine and adding it up in the buildfarm members > > where it passes the regression tests, or there are are some more > > requirements over and above the machine resource requirements after > > which PGDG can officially support those OS/architecture combinations ? > > The buildfarm machines have nothing to do with the build daemons > behind apt.postgresql.org or yum.postgresql.org; they are entirely > different infrastructure. Ok. > > I guess asking the buildfarm operators if they can spare machines as > build daemons might work, but I haven't had the time to dig into that. > If you care about a specific architecture, it would be nice if you > could arrange that. I just checked; it is possible for me to arrange for an aarch64 VM with the configuration you mentioned : > Are you able to provide a build host for arm64? Specs would be > something like >= 8 cores, 8 GB of RAM, 100 GB disk, root access.