MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAOMoQbTOZ0ZLUnsu2Z8NJkS3JrjKDpbYgfWWn0KD_jGBJHnj6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZUeg2NeBnD7kTJbD@msg.df7cb.de> <ZUkThiWJt6rE5Uiv@msg.df7cb.de>
 <CAOMoQbSx15rmheFUXH+8=ddXcpbFKhEFUfu7jd2=hbvaW1v6BQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZUtDOVJ8BFmunksM@msg.df7cb.de> <Zg6ZOBu386aZAfHY@msg.df7cb.de>
In-Reply-To: <Zg6ZOBu386aZAfHY@msg.df7cb.de>
From: Bradford Boyle <bradford.d.boyle@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:06:13 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOMoQbQS5b5i7ZAomy9ro9=xFVMLC-HcAB+ZDGxxueZFMK8UWg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Updated packaging for MobilityDB 1.1.0
To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOMoQbQS5b5i7ZAomy9ro9%3DxFVMLC-HcAB%2BZDGxxueZFMK8UWg%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Christoph,

> where are we with MobilityDB? Are the remaining test failures a
> problem in the source, or just artifacts of the way we try to run the
> tests?

I pushed a commit to s.d.o this past weekend updating the version from
1.1.0~rc.1 to 1.1.0. Looking at the latest build on pgdgbuild [1], I see
that there is a failure for sid amd64. I've only looked at the build
output briefly but it looks like the failure is building against
postgres 12:

    meos/src/general/tsequence.c:3116:19: error: implicit declaration
of function =E2=80=98hash_bytes_uint32=E2=80=99;

There have been some recent commits on this file (tsequence.c) between
1.1.0~rc.1 and 1.1.0 but I'll need to investigate more to figure out a
fix.

--Bradford


[1]: https://pgdgbuild.dus.dg-i.net/job/mobilitydb-binaries/8/