Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ouykl-0006nF-CD for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:25:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ouyki-0005Oy-Lh for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:25:36 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ouyki-0005Oq-Fx for pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:25:36 +0000 Received: from feynman.df7cb.de ([195.49.152.168]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ouyke-00032L-HS for pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:25:36 +0000 Received: from msg.df7cb.de (unknown [IPv6:2003:5b:203b:100:7627:eaff:fe52:8e03]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) by feynman.df7cb.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4NBWkL61Ynz3F0w; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:25:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:25:29 +0100 From: Christoph Berg To: Aaron Pavely Cc: PostgreSQL in Debian Subject: Re: Repository key handling changed Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Berg , Aaron Pavely , PostgreSQL in Debian References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Re: Aaron Pavely > I am wondering if the repository keys should have gone into > postgresql-client-common, since there are cases where one will have > postgresql-client-common installed, but not postgresql-common (e.g., hosts > needing only the client libraries). Good point. I had the same idea, but then went with postgresql-common because that already had the apt.postgresql.org.sh script, but maybe we should revisit that and move the files over. (Moving in that direction is easy since -common depends on -client-common.) Christoph