Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsNzR-001PNQ-Ok for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:27:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsNzP-00764w-DC for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:27:23 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsNzP-00764c-74 for pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:27:23 +0000 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tsNzM-002RnF-2T for pgsql-pkg-debian@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:27:21 +0000 Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZCZHk2pPfz9sXg for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:27:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:27:13 +0100 From: Christoph Berg To: PostgreSQL in Debian Subject: s390x on hold Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4ZCZHk2pPfz9sXg List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk The our s390x buildd has been unstable from the beginning, making testsuites time out for random reasons, so we had to click "retry" a lot. Reducing the number of parallel build and test jobs from 8 to 2 made it better, but now the build queue is often 8 hours long and we can't really do work without waiting a long time. IBM has indicated there are currently no resources to relocate the machine to a less busy place, so I decided to stop building s390x packages now. We will re-enable the architecture if the situation improves, but at the moment I would not recommend betting on it. If that doesn't happen before July, we'll remove the architecture from the archive. Christoph