Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoqK8-0002iY-7R for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:08:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoqK7-0001Jf-Pl for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:08:47 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoqK4-0001GL-Nq for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:08:44 +0000 Received: from ns3.gunduz.org ([107.170.88.27] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoqK2-0000a4-IH for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:08:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [107.170.88.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 461EF45442; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1445422119.28455.26.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: pg_partman93 From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn_Marqu=E9s?= , Glauco Torres Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:08:39 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <56201C39.20508@2ndquadrant.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0jRGQjChFek3V/SJ3UCu" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-yum Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-yum-owner@postgresql.org --=-0jRGQjChFek3V/SJ3UCu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 09:34 -0300, Mart=C3=ADn Marqu=C3=A9s wrote: > I think what really got me thinking it was 2.0 was when I checked the > spec file in the pgrpms git repository: >=20 > [martin@coruscant F-21]$ pwd > /home/martin/git/pgrpms/rpm/redhat/9.3/pg_partman/F-21 > [martin@coruscant F-21]$ grep -i version pg_partman.spec > %global pgmajorversion 93 > Name: %{sname}%{pgmajorversion} > Version: 2.1.0 *sigh*, my mistake. Will fix in a few days. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=9CND=C3=9CZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Dan=C4=B1=C5=9Fman=C4=B1/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-0jRGQjChFek3V/SJ3UCu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJWJ2QnAAoJENjDPf6Sz261HFMP/0d84jXqVlc610nGic8d7yQy hQKVSdKT93tg7wLuzab9EfcQ/DjSPI0s7d09v0W7ZvLsdJX5h9ZwO9475XVCdVgg cCFcjeSD2zzX/II5BiPySjPC0xmUyTtWVf3PF3ojk8n4PO1tX3Ty6g1VUM0fREHd ZNiXGIwEnqQhIjav9wd4c1to/N1kVuhHvpgTBhCLE/4iSo9nqJrfjSyaW6BVkzdn 22RUpeSDZhcjc/HXibWz17ePyIoGiQ5wWPfeZEPE75pOId9MLluKYnb4s7fVYVQh MM6JlhMgvgbTuVcSYNcuiogSbxKnoGXeVI/KX+CFodWknmkfkuX4V3556G9T4bbz x4AMah+SOEjiqcKtORKNXXOXwNS3mV5IhDRuowzBgEHfHkR2k3VJLO9y/LjkM0On Zbh8kSVpv3HmT6m85kgUYQNtGBJTV/oZcck3Vbl5bvfdxNqcYFLfJhZJihotkF/H AFAcSRkc6PDyHhfNgh9oUJHe7aBRr00LjC/X9IkgubWfilA1LD6c3NmGcrg2Darq 0DeL5QUcH9wpw8WGy0WD2WNg1a91o3HsD3+XjNsGukdvHFGCyJ18KXUGtpTkWz2y bMRVTJA2GPqiRgIUPAPPdPmQGsl5mllaK5SKW92sudP+0dtdcFMBfqQqhjRCSH9o d5nE4p5ZGuAekpcBEFjZ =yfWV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0jRGQjChFek3V/SJ3UCu--