public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <[email protected]>
To: Craig Ringer <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New and unified 9.5 spec file is in git
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:17:14 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMsr+YFNvjv1NDwuFqBvvg9SV4h1Y-CFVTwaLM4MJ5FHFg3o5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAMsr+YFqaX7shapoLRJ2S7QD1vst9ENrOtGU-_OD18Z=vpoHTA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMsr+YFNvjv1NDwuFqBvvg9SV4h1Y-CFVTwaLM4MJ5FHFg3o5w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-pkg-yum>
Hi,
On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 11:52 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> It built perfectly with mock on Fedora 21 for a F23 target.
> Brilliant!
Thanks for checking!
> To make it clear that they're the same is it worth having a common/
> directory at the same level as EL-5, F-23, etc and symlinking the
> specfile to the various subdirs from there, along with any identical
> patches etc?
That would be the next step. Let's finish the actual work first.
> I'm really happy about this, since it means the build depends are now
> correct and it can be built without needing a dedicated build machine
> using nothing but mock. No need to manually set up dependencies
> anymore, set up a build box, etc. No need to juggle x86_64 and i386
> either, you can run builds for *everything* from a single F23 box or
> VM or docker or whatever.
Well, we are building 100+ packages in 9.5 set. Setting up a new mock
environment everytime would slow us down, IMHO. What do you think?
> If the same process is followed for other packages
*All* of the *recently added* spec files are unified nowadays :) This
also applies to some specs that I found time to rework on (like
postgis, repmgr, etc.). The repo is not fully unified yet, but we are
on it.
> Since you seem to be using Docker to prep build envs now
Err, no. We are using actual VMs (powered by libvirtd+qemu-kvm)
> it's less of an issue than when the build boxes are hand-maintained,
> but the great thing about mock is that it gets all the build depends
> info straight from the spec file.
All deps are already installed on our build servers. If not, we install
them before building a new package.
> The EL-5 package built happily under mock for -r epel-5-i386 too. I
> didn't
> test install it.
This is great testing. Appreciated, thanks!
> Thanks so much. This is great and I really hope you got some use out
> of my prior work on it.
You are welcome. As I wrote a few mins ago, I really was inspired from
your work.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (819B, 2-signature.asc)
download
view thread (11+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: New and unified 9.5 spec file is in git
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox