Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzee-0003t9-69 for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:31:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzed-0004rr-Ki for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:31:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzed-0004rk-9W for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:31:23 +0000 Received: from ns3.gunduz.org ([107.170.88.27] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzeV-0004ZK-NI for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:31:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [107.170.88.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2154A4487D; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1468337470.30929.26.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Jeff Frost Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 18:31:10 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1468336162.30929.22.camel@gunduz.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gngP3sBRhpTQulQ6YSSl" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.3 (3.20.3-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-yum Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-yum-owner@postgresql.org --=-gngP3sBRhpTQulQ6YSSl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jeff, On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 08:14 -0700, Jeff Frost wrote: > If the chart is to be believed, the only issue is: >=20 > ipv6+CNAME buggy in <=3D1.10 >=20 > Do you know which versions are standard in the supported distros these da= ys? RHEL 5: 1.6.0 RHEL 6, RHEL 7, Fedora 22, Fedora 23: 1.10.0 Fedora 24, rawhide: 1.11.0 Quick note: Even though CNAME+IPv6 is buggy, that feature even does not exi= st in libevent (at least this is what I understand from the chart ("ipv4 only"= )), so we are not introducing new bugs here. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=9CND=C3=9CZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Dan=C4=B1=C5=9Fman=C4=B1/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-gngP3sBRhpTQulQ6YSSl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXhQ0/AAoJENjDPf6Sz261QR8QAKIej/ReIMWPSDR6ciPFqWox CREs8vUrhATesdkdllIpLfy1beuRtJPxoxR15dST0gwPxoym8D3EdzNqYuXS+brN 4oXzn174BrnyEouof5Wv9xFTh/TdwSvW5981tsytXuhq9Prjywt+yackBUnAHf3n Px+LvilDE8+DOpf59CDMsSrWenBbfdW7yxOMxf48CyLF+7zk21ttZUnr53QERvt1 g+H/N6wj07/qGRK4e4RYd8xuaXoaUzO+Fhfx8kdol3K/Ag+qjUTAVx4NlF83w39w YJqo3A7veNkbQvIf5k27UNiTtFYkNY9PX+VABYBjduO0u7mnd65o8UkO4V1BWpUJ sNu+KEHu7NTWKK7CtaVQxj1ea/jBu48j8hCCNwMLLyftpY/9UbvEa+KzeZenpT28 Xvvy0AP3NHWdtDYUopucdHtfTvfnEqesx77oLbUsBickJI4oqNOpfiD/2eXkpeHd u2iONbmd5QK6O1KvXmYD/COPsvbJZeZ/8buKdogMJcdcwQC/3t5JTNy2xn2kz68m wJeG2woR+GT6TV8XW8iRL4hkDlCNhigcVJmoFn3v2kO+mEsC9lnbN9R7xEdRkQK3 /xutEwPn1j4FmK46ynZCdGWaENtQJzz+xGpUj1xSIhLXH4Fnf8zg3IQ296S+jODM IDM9sEGSDG7yEzsGF5jY =ypHF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gngP3sBRhpTQulQ6YSSl--