Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d43ce-0004Ev-8X for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:59:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d43cd-0003Ut-Ll for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:59:35 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d43cd-0003Uj-6w for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:59:35 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d43cZ-0001ow-IC for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:59:33 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop03.gunduz.org (unknown [46.154.48.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C61D3FCF4; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1493377167.11169.7.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: pgbouncer socket directory From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:59:27 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1493289043.3032.43.camel@gunduz.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mHb5ij2ngSMMC8bGBmjL" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 (3.22.6-2.fc25) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-yum Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-yum-owner@postgresql.org --=-mHb5ij2ngSMMC8bGBmjL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 12:00 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Debian, there is no separate pgbouncer user and it runs as "postgres". If my memory serves well, there was a community request about switching fro= m postgres to pgbouncer user in the past, and that was the reason why we swit= ched to that one. > Alternatively, add pgbouncer to the postgres group and change the > permissions to 0775. >=20 > (Or just change them to 0777 and forget the rest.) Will 0777 be secure? Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Dan=C4=B1=C5=9Fman=C4=B1/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-mHb5ij2ngSMMC8bGBmjL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJZAyCPAAoJENjDPf6Sz261mnMP/2u80J8gTZTJ5cx18lfdTIak rb2NWxOMrt3jWJpynFnOPj2n8nim81mEnH8qyFyed8yqt2vQ0gofxCALWsmD7aHs PaAnXi/hUMNUK3K1DjT7XbGvoJtdQIXpIZPk7uXXVIObVJ8pYii0fRli1r1t6G32 hrBWtvxJB7x84hYpRjUj14O0BtSwQpBvvxrawXdUCj4EaDxIfRxP+uFK7fK2/wyc YXYlf14ogFRJAhv8f/FV7iyIdWpapIHt257ZlvthDJSesoWa2giq54eDqYQqogXN 2HHu9U+O2pWRzK+Fw/I3H+jVCeYMLvsAEeJkz4O+KOb2LjTvo8jxtFXacigtWp8S Pw1tbqEc4RJScLUnsR/+IWcDZzI/9QAGMSFA6KdV0L51Ikc+tP+xIXcUaxr8Bdwy fHPNzj0MHxGO7JqQVPUNoyqa4aybgR/BzOAbvLD+xBoPC4M5+1kZp64/S/yBeJI2 y/7fqcaCAl5NgfAU6I9t57N4yjQDmnYYc4pZuAOpD827dcXpgHvAhwg5GjEcI21P B7+jJeHcDz/SDgAUh/nOqAZWoGTp8hbKvTJLdAR3swUfUj+mK6/hdCM8erN2Gv9Y wQU9JAJ6Z0nFm04ASf2jbSA4+QLv3H3qhANe/jdnUMKuBhQpKdTBLnxtl8/emLjV QEOeSCuJ+dvnV/bWWRs0 =RLpI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mHb5ij2ngSMMC8bGBmjL--