Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYpKM-0002gb-A2 for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 07:59:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYpKL-0008PU-3a for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 07:59:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYpKJ-0008PH-LB for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 07:59:51 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYpKG-0007Cz-3q for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 07:59:49 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop03.gunduz.org (unknown [88.248.122.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 054E13FCF2; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 07:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1500710382.2815.1.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: patch bug in 9.6 spec From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn_Marqu=E9s?= , pgsql-pkg-yum Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 10:59:42 +0300 In-Reply-To: <96c26493-91f1-801f-9590-89d090abf98c@2ndquadrant.com> References: <96c26493-91f1-801f-9590-89d090abf98c@2ndquadrant.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cseEsV6MrFh27QN2DutF" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.4 (3.24.4-1.fc26) Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-yum Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-yum-owner@postgresql.org --=-cseEsV6MrFh27QN2DutF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Martin, On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 22:16 -0300, Mart=C3=ADn Marqu=C3=A9s wrote: > I was making a custom build with a patch for 9.6 and found this which > seems to be a bug in the spec file of postgresql 9.6.3 src.rpm package: >=20 > %patch6 -p1 > %if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} <=3D 5 > %patch7 -p1 > %endif >=20 > Compilation passed because I'm using rhel7, but that patch doesn't exist > in the spec file, so if someone would have tried to compile it on rhel5 > it would have failed. >=20 > I didn't do much digging on when it got there, but it seems it would be > good to remove it. I think you are using an older version of the spec file -- this is from 9.6= .3-2=20 changelog: - Remove nonexistent Patch7 reference I refactored the spec files recently, so please let me know if you see more issues. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Dan=C4=B1=C5=9Fman=C4=B1/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-cseEsV6MrFh27QN2DutF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAllzBe4ACgkQ2MM9/pLP brUMBw//RT4U2fuQPPU8jMFSKZEb7MvdMD0HQG9xiiWbUmfhYCs34NAbmvSQzfpK RJ270zt/0kmgL8pdhND+tl2vWbbTqChyZkJdsenp4d1B3UD1U5+hz+qy8TK9sr5Q 5Vcx90plFCe1vOVBRzpPGYDzTdeRh3Nuor9KDVRfuq69dle4mFQunoLY33cVFnCU pkVnO0RdzKgYQAM0TMvh3vizIoqcS0zbdbnudjq0sTikTeXxqR4wgWvgP5uGz53O tIXeSMxywb4hhvp170sLnEW7gwW+Hz06UPbBcy0oq49nVzYWd5+c83gK4nAgmAf+ rtP+YddakkXklNrCh9hTteec00CRvSNjkRXvKFquUSSX/minPfKqZsdY0GMMi9Pr 1hewltMETNoF+ehE9D+EIvFXdCMwBDe1Oi3MorSgdParXfu56Du3g8IjMsghBb0+ QoUXYyNRVD8naQTimXjeyM+FcqsR/A7iOTu/iQZ+gzheSokwM8mFKYzWG+G2yJ6+ kpoDEQGj2aulRF/cYHGxJDaslL+nJjiqMFzqz8tUyJbl091U0rx2qDE2vJ3GRWng MbGQOcQegrfu0OlDBh7LjB/DslRN/qCm8W9xwgl4QUhETa7+cilLU3tN0tAzgX3H +QH7v/kjCE0TjE+D4hZweOLqrZwss2c1ir3hOQUkp6g9KHhtZU0= =sUQM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cseEsV6MrFh27QN2DutF--