Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzuUU-0001ba-J9 for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:58:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzuUT-0001Bx-EO for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:58:17 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzuUP-000151-1d for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:58:13 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzuUG-0001sf-SQ for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:58:11 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop03.gunduz.org (unknown [88.98.219.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF4BD3FD2C; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 00:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1507165080.3791.63.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: postgis24_96 replaces postgis2_96, causing issues From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Jimmy Angelakos , pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 01:58:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <547d8b5c-d037-0bae-2983-f428dfcc8f77@ed.ac.uk> References: <547d8b5c-d037-0bae-2983-f428dfcc8f77@ed.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nv0ufUE/DN8S9tDnqtpG" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.5 (3.24.5-1.fc26) Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-yum Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-yum-owner@postgresql.org --=-nv0ufUE/DN8S9tDnqtpG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jimmy, On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:44 +0100, Jimmy Angelakos wrote: > Recently in rhel-7-x86_64, postgis24_96 replaced postgis2_96 by=20 > obsoleting the latter meta-package, instead of adding a=20 > postgis2_96-2.4.0 package. >=20 > Because some of our Geo services had version locks on postgres and=20 > postgis2_96, this has caused a number of problems in those services that= =20 > colleagues are mitigating right now. Is it possible to get a=20 > postgis2_96-2.4.0 and to revert so that postgis24_96 does not replace=20 > postgis2_96? Unfortunately, we can't revert that change, because we already started supporting more than 1 PostGIS version for many of PG releases :( Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-nv0ufUE/DN8S9tDnqtpG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAlnVg5gACgkQ2MM9/pLP brWB3Q/+LRV3D9yCEpMUN7QpQbS7vWn+j28pbe8suLzkC4ojh08xGaMSOiyEh1HN 3+z6691utKaLLKOKhvDuHGC7rhoV3krbwkdJJcStGANPKwYcnraHZrr3txIw68nw NdWNmspL0rTEzGdnI01HtD6JSWwzZDscTo62PDOJ/myJ7OvGeBLtzl5C0f5BXV/7 lPsRJfe3xQkLvAqJNwKF82H2Lca0qFKGfWT+kbWDbzWpjZfTAfAVETlwtuEkm1jI GZSqT+QOXqjS7jWEcxeyqAh+HpSQE6o18wRtq9YQaoUx5xOXLt5z6BrU1i0sCri4 b9aqz/og2agI2KQVEaxMXHhg5SKsg1XiadAA2WQZwS940iC6xgdsdPu4B0wa53eq 6qFfzVgdEm34rrGB8+qfz5f8/kxm2xGcu3ejqBP3SnHb3kogM0igQxXRpvKJLLWU 9LbYV6WQB928fGpcM31Ibe9HcJRDPJBz7cu8b1I6ALcYh8quewMrOb5Pus20LA2W qeh+YV3XsSQlti6MV8Luu3KNsIQzTrHufqFnu9NDMC126T2RGtzX/RtNh7ir+2Dh ya5E508cBKn6gcKrvwOjqvvENPamQErsREDWUVpQxABcT9BjY55GkaH4RWfKfrHq 55y0M+BdvXCyQFABytkK7G/DXPL4NXV0VETglGc0dvRK05tpfBk= =nsaU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nv0ufUE/DN8S9tDnqtpG--