Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1efmaG-0006zY-Og for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:01:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1efmaE-0002ee-BA for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:01:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1efmaE-0002eV-6i for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:01:18 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1efma8-0002Hn-Qm for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:01:17 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop04.gunduz.org (unknown [88.98.205.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D17753FCFE; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1517144465.6878.8.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: Problem yum install postgis24_10 From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Glauco Torres , pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:01:05 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-p8r16qt4tCilRbZvUm41" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.4 (3.26.4-1.fc27) Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --=-p8r16qt4tCilRbZvUm41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 10:02 -0200, Glauco Torres wrote: > Trying to install libarmadillo, the available version of EPEL is 8 and wh= at > postgis needs is 4? Does it really make sense to have a dependency on > something from postgis in EPEL, correct would not the dependencies be > directly in the PGDG repository ...? >=20 > Or does not it make sense? It makes sense, actually. This update breaks some of the EPEL policies, but still... Anyway, just rebuilt gdal (1.11.4-12) with the new armadillo. Pushed to v10 repos, they will sync shortly. Working on other repos now. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-p8r16qt4tCilRbZvUm41 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAlptyZEACgkQ2MM9/pLP brW6wA//aN5i45XF/gqYvVADAvBGdiCo3B0VmSxSHq5LTpFLjV9gK1OUzPwED6/s bHgHMfcf9gdq2PfozRxIpKmCw3H719QTuAf3Q1kKtBoEPaflOzk41BTBWtYT7bTN UA8FayW9pSuExkJYSzHMQE0QOfg0+Yd5l7gXh+bazbg/BrK7vczq+zn/t00wM7VO CU0uNk2SUXye2da3rAkdfgJsVQWt49gFX3Tuw7o5ZFfkQpXOEuMRfr9wziJQdxi0 Suv7p07gxnGHZGGOvz+LkXX71nAWiToI6WjD2hB6Svc3jHkRPq7WTYT17b6Nsth/ xU/zvpslL5FPt2cQa+Tt/4UEZnVoK5JldJMzSht5JEeSJtQ/nMHWJuJyD4RhPd+N rxpGGemc1eyZ2Ry5Ckbotv9jLmEkV37Z0mrFPn7w8tKx4fXNqszhMHpA1zpjBh51 yNpONG+LjVcFviB7cv3CSGrne03YzKCGXSi4B7xQY0gGOjGrkkwyOZD37Oz1NPu5 VYSao8NEfuq60e1HilzAO1T33WmsAwvUMxRe1fWSgO7i2IeZ3EBgPDbvygePHuTi DRMl++CJoejjCNbpkRUBT18+OLddUnzaM8abCNykAKSrh4fhiZvNP+WW8HMQEHjS pX3jfQIndd1KG0Ln2U+c28ik3Mgz3A02akkcZtRfJYajcLvITlU= =yrb0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-p8r16qt4tCilRbZvUm41--