Message-Id: 
 <1518709012.2436685.1271989280.388553A8@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: James Cassell <fedoraproject@cyberpear.com>
To: PostgreSQL Yum Package List <pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
In-Reply-To: 
 <1518569422.2509698.1270023472.6C898294@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:36:52 -0500
References: 
 <1518569422.2509698.1270023472.6C898294@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Subject: Re: broken postgis23_95 dependencies on CentOS/RHEL 6
Precedence: bulk

Thanks for fixing this issue!


V/r,
James Cassell


On Tue, Feb 13, 2018, at 7:50 PM, James Cassell wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> Thanks for creating a yum repo for these packages.  I find it quite=20
> useful at work!
>=20
> Unfortunately, I'm now getting the following error when trying to 'yum=20
> install postgis23_95' on a RHEL 6 box:
>=20
> Error: Package: postgis23_95-2.3.6-2.rhel6.x86_64 (pgdg95)
>            Requires: geos36 >=3D 3.6.2
> Error: Package: postgis23_95-2.3.6-2.rhel6.x86_64 (pgdg95)
>            Requires: libproj.so.12()(64bit)
> Error: Package: postgis23_95-2.3.6-2.rhel6.x86_64 (pgdg95)
>            Requires: proj49
>=20
> If I install the older version, it works fine. ('yum install=20
> postgis23_95-2.3.4')  (The changelog says the functional version is=20
> 2.3.5, but the RPM says 2.3.4.)
>=20
> The pgdg95/rhel-6-x86_64 yum repo doesn't have the necessary=20
> dependencies for postgis23_95; specifically, the geos36 package is=20
> missing and also the proj49 package. The repo does have geos-3.5 and=20
> proj-4.8, but the package name doesn't match (also the version).
>=20
> I see this in the changelog:
> postgis23_95-2.3.6-2.rhel6.x86_64        pgdg95
> * Sun Jan 28 12:00:00 2018 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz <> - 2.3.6-2
> - Let PostGIS 2.3 depend on PGDG supplied Proj49 and GeOS 36 RPMs.
>   This will help users to benefit from latest GeOS and Proj.
>=20
> The rhel-7-x86_64 version of the repo does have the proj49 and geos36=20
> rpms,
> but the rhel-6-x86_64 versions of the repo lacks those RPMs, hence the
> issue, and hence why it took a few days to catch this.  (Likely many=20
> other people are using CentOS/RHEL 7.)
>=20
>=20
> If there's any other info that would be helpful, please let me know!
>=20
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> V/r,
> James Cassell
>