Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fT7aA-0001ZL-Hq for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:21:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fT7a9-0001Wu-83 for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:21:09 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fT7a9-0001Wk-33 for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:21:09 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fT7a4-0001Ea-4U for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:21:08 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop04.gunduz.org (unknown [217.111.1.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D33623FD1F; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1f713f77a9091e3d0d7d584f4fd65987c7eebe4c.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: Reg: CentOS-6 i386 RPM for PostgreSQL 10 From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Shravan Pulse Secure , pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:20:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-a2O2V6ZtDuHDR1zpBg2r" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.2 (3.28.2-1.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --=-a2O2V6ZtDuHDR1zpBg2r Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 09:37 +0530, Shravan Pulse Secure wrote: >=20 > I see list of available PostgreSQL RPMs on page > https://yum.postgresql.org/repopackages.php >=20 > I can see that CentOS-6 i386 RPM for PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6. But I don't > see the same for PostgreSQL 10. I can see only CentOS-6 x86_64 but not fo= r > CentOS-6 i386. >=20 > Does this mean PostgreSQL 10 is not supported on 32 bit CentOS-6? Sorry, it is my bad. CentOS 6 - i386 is still supported, even for v11. I updated that page to reflect this. Thanks for the report! Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-a2O2V6ZtDuHDR1zpBg2r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAlshNloACgkQ2MM9/pLP brXIsw/9E3Dkqk4bEANN0SmN8Uu9FsOPe8mMImTZ+9FAGf7Fddo4Co4el63Y5s1y 54dOwwwlY0rndi1hOus3GiS12S6rNMaITqigVZZ2IffjJkEJX/JojX/0iT9fc6Iv p0r2OJQC5mF2Si0KcKE6OkVDrdATH96uw4Nq86b6Z/naCEyVHJ9bA2b3D7SAQu+q eOwI9riSk8/c7w2dGJ8C8Bbh09PiYCEIRAkuZY/Smvh2uIVF8FXXI51b0fiMst98 p+fx5/5URgPxVVMpLAUCHr13x6bpgXEpYJP350XY0FeeaGdDv40DLpBX0xA0YvA3 uVWgNciyEiB14fLStePLkPIS9hRVTGleEedn2DQ5UVIRLDj4q1q2BSFOEU+7Hy4r 0r9o8NmARjl0SuJ6dsGd6IL4/gBM3R+ukiUU3t63oBPC5igOLIbIqFlbZpH/Xvti ZF2HllpRFyesDeGzm4DzmpXJ9g7wSZ2YjNME8SY/cCvEmDoEjBWD9xZ0UJJcwm0i Zffb29aBWaAhj33jlJMDKtiHAiSqbweSGcYKgUNmeAQSc7CrfRuiuVMBGf+cGfnE Sn3ZOoHud+EMqd+dPImCT8hJ95oCFootxE1lsIHRZuTI2UhLEG0DO6Vm6o7NXHog 7Y+WnjYH7LDtDxKSkZkiIXdc6GVQoY5LnGng3IfP2NNmfTh8Qm0= =lINH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-a2O2V6ZtDuHDR1zpBg2r--