Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:33:13 -0600
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Devrim =?iso-8859-1?B?R/xuZPx6?= <devrim@gunduz.org>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: libgeotiff (Re: PG10 postgis24 + gdal on RHEL6)
Message-ID: <20171208193313.GG14216@telsasoft.com>
References: <20171129100319.GA12026@telsasoft.com>
 <1511950968.5887.14.camel@gunduz.org>
 <20171207210245.GB14216@telsasoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20171207210245.GB14216@telsasoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Precedence: bulk

I compared lists of RPMs available for PG10 vs PG96 for RHEL6 and found that
these seem to be missing for PG10.  That primarily affects new installs, users
who upgrade from PG10 are likely to have the PG96 PGDG repo still.

libgeotiff proj libpqxx?

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:02:45PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:22:48AM +0000, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 04:03 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > Just wanted to point out that the GDAL package seems to be unavailable for
> > > PG10 for (at least) centos6.
> > 
> > Apologies for the inconvenience. I just pushed the packages to repo. They will
> > be available 1 hour later.
> 
> It looks like maybe the same thing is true for libgeotiff.x86_64 ?
> ..which I see is available @pgdg94, and 96, but not 10.