Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePYyM-0001MB-Bd for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:15:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePYyL-0001Ej-Ii for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:15:09 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePYyK-0001Df-UD for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:15:09 +0000 Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ePYyH-00039F-Hn for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:15:07 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id d137so13558092itc.2 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:15:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telsasoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=k8SqVUPUaEMhW/VvAFB8d61RrM7SCaLok5A2001+LKI=; b=Y6R0ActOYI0TSYPjrJoCkdGG/fMxJkMDwWyqfSzM+m/CIpczsmQ2tP+ABdv/lmx5lw xPLps9WGpDROPudDUjGAEmbuZhhgnZPwjB2NEKqKTTcbtWE8MsE+DkNYbKKjUDYd9JDH jQ2L++MZNURMauyW3UQp3xESdlh/3wnLarVMrYshKGK/6Pp1FGGGcfSwKuwOqvYMrWsX baHxMcCJ5/7Er/6fCP7vChfoWycX2rKDg4RY2l67qazR8WMrUlAbvOT219tN2786HgQD fsdho2vAPbkA2/L1FsY4ghNeHRhyLvUPNfasii9eDFuuR0njcKJuKf24w4lOJNhZ9S6u D9kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=k8SqVUPUaEMhW/VvAFB8d61RrM7SCaLok5A2001+LKI=; b=kHnZjVd5QbN50IPifSwuF5zh8OEFtZI7LM5qnjFdvBya3yDvRPqMUICDWEZU/qhH/u Kv4fS6GggWPRY/dI6WlpxZySk9An2qhMkdZ1wZ8fRhfOe5DAlxhjzEVDcacF+gyG82ju lOHkPn3fWLZPYUanUP8GHw9ZOEDDeDzPBw4dHBk8WEdG+hAIeb7UMZTmvJY6fcIJMZZz zMq4oo5BskNLV6cQDiHWVM1lMkkZ4YcjbVdphzOhwGHTXIISxiqGaQi+2adMDhiqhjqa pGhUF2+gNVOVcG+zmFsfL5P0o3lyWtFVw6CFkfrxsCOdIa9ZacQvl/k/f6ijA8Ee7X3P zNXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJVb3kmetuZ9D0EkgkjqeHnd7hxH3p/btoa/t6F2A71LYTYcKg2 K0YK4ViEsM/QgeSGXo6HfPP/hngwOho= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosXJXKTFG0oZrkn+6H3skCpbucnizjrwthyO4qMfb5/z25Zous0iUBNEHJbxFFw1nYAryTgUA== X-Received: by 10.36.3.65 with SMTP id e62mr4326152ite.99.1513278904338; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:15:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pryzbyj (charmander.telsasoft.com. [50.244.222.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r186sm2973278itb.13.2017.12.14.11.15.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:15:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by pryzbyj (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B8D180105E; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:15:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:15:02 -0600 From: Justin Pryzby To: Devrim =?iso-8859-1?B?R/xuZPx6?= Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org Subject: Re: libgeotiff (Re: PG10 postgis24 + gdal on RHEL6) Message-ID: <20171214191502.GA5645@telsasoft.com> References: <20171129100319.GA12026@telsasoft.com> <1511950968.5887.14.camel@gunduz.org> <20171207210245.GB14216@telsasoft.com> <20171208193313.GG14216@telsasoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20171208193313.GG14216@telsasoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Just checking in. Our deployment scripts intending to use PG10 currently fail unless I install PGDG PG96 repo rpm. On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:33:13PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I compared lists of RPMs available for PG10 vs PG96 for RHEL6 and found that > these seem to be missing for PG10. That primarily affects new installs, users > who upgrade from PG10 are likely to have the PG96 PGDG repo still. > > libgeotiff proj libpqxx? > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:02:45PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:22:48AM +0000, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 04:03 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > Just wanted to point out that the GDAL package seems to be unavailable for > > > > PG10 for (at least) centos6. > > > > > > Apologies for the inconvenience. I just pushed the packages to repo. They will > > > be available 1 hour later. > > > > It looks like maybe the same thing is true for libgeotiff.x86_64 ? > > ..which I see is available @pgdg94, and 96, but not 10. -- Justin Pryzby System Administrator Telsasoft +1-952-707-8581