Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fS7Xo-0003ZJ-Qv for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:06:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fS7Xn-0002Q3-Go for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:06:35 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fS7Xn-0002Pt-Br for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:06:35 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fS7Xk-0006Ng-A1 for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:06:34 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop04.gunduz.org (unknown [176.55.5.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A5853FD1F; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <202142f4593b0c418a3e14fc4109deaaef5ce4c4.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: mysql_fdw.x86_64 v2.4 RPM now depends on mysql-devel From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Alessio Checcucci , pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:06:15 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-DTprXIbA6jLiYMqT1ffN" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.2 (3.28.2-1.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --=-DTprXIbA6jLiYMqT1ffN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 14:32 +0100, Alessio Checcucci wrote: > I noticed that the last build of mysql_fdw.x86_64 (v2.4) depends on > mysql-devel (and mysql-libs), while until v2.3 mysql-devel was not part o= f > the dependency list and does not seem to be required. > Is there any specific reason for the addition? It provides the .so file that the FDW needs. I know it is a bit weird, but = this is what it is. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-DTprXIbA6jLiYMqT1ffN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAlsdkscACgkQ2MM9/pLP brUBCA//a+xLvHEre3RZsmRB5OsTKH+EYVbO8hR7EXdbfqpYhfrxhRHDO2hBU6wq yyHG3kj8v1ErIetOPUMU5b3g1itTbMgsZk9ZDVksFCNaRZyD90sbWATX3YZiGOVh avpzN+o19i/9Ixspefk4+vkNn01XPAhJtyrFGAjaTsDm6edIc7ij39nE9XCBH0s5 m+p5uWX8oCjQMXICtiS8MUj5Gzw2fM8RzPBEbKCsaNg5ZE4xoYK360OLxpEVtden 0JlIdFo6J+UJc83IFdesXJt6k3oTZp/W3oZmuIEbfulneryIMwEannnVn+SBV4m8 rJO3ncDOEXSWNunRorN9iao8GzUUFKWPkbibNOGBjYW/IwO7Nvaap3gak5xl2UsZ innB7JgcHdaiVQEKVOJetMSzxAeKDqlSoR8pS0bzsJWg89m/4QF7SUq/xeXKP2bG 7Dyxecdm8a7s0mi7g8EWJvRipuszJikj3IzBkqb3OnqbMThfCFW0FR4tc4mqvPTU gbrvm0c2LBbxrMijT9T23BEVbAES/fwzX3NzYn3T6oiMtUICtxDf5UmpKmIPBCb0 zp7movkHDDTaowPYA73qA26XbcePHDdZCpouqKGCwz1x9vgVlev8gzlX2Nz3Gr1H aXfKpHYTk/LfEv57XYDgCcHtGZnBaXoWhY9EO1kvFujFrU9FSXU= =poye -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DTprXIbA6jLiYMqT1ffN--