Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1flVUE-0003hr-8Y for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:31:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1flVUC-0002ai-Sq for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:31:00 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1flVUC-0002ab-Kn for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:31:00 +0000 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73] helo=mx1.redhat.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1flVU9-0001G5-SX for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:30:59 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095DB819701E; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 08:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nb.usersys.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2332026D65; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 08:30:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Pavel Raiskup To: pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org Cc: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= , Alexandru Lazarev , Adrian Klaver , pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Who and How is responsible for released installations packages and 3rd party packs? (e.g. on https://yum.postgresql.org/9.6/redhat/rhel-7.3-x86_64/) Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 10:30:51 +0200 Message-ID: <2836136.ULnCWUqcGg@nb.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1cdedaf455c4f326f31b103ab805d48da9914cb7.camel@gunduz.org> References: <1cdedaf455c4f326f31b103ab805d48da9914cb7.camel@gunduz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:30:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:30:56 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4' DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'praiskup@redhat.com' RCPT:'' List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Friday, August 3, 2018 8:08:55 AM CEST Devrim G=FCnd=FCz wrote: > On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 16:26 +0300, Alexandru Lazarev wrote: > > What about 3rd party libraries like plv8 - Who and How (based on which > > criteria, which versions) build RPM and upload them there? > > Latest versions of PL/v8 does not build on RHEL/Fedora anymore, at least = from > the package build point of view. Yes, packaging of plv8 is pretty complicated. If one decided to ship RPM package with plv8, it would mean maintenance of whole v8 language - which is incredibly complicated (incompatible changes all the time, backporting security fixes, etc.). That's the reason why plv8 (and even v8 runtime) becomes dropped from Linux distributions. [1] https://github.com/plv8/plv8/issues/281 Pavel