Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1trpFJ-009xA1-Ti for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 02:21:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1trpFI-0052hM-Ep for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 02:21:28 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1trpFI-0052eQ-88 for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 02:21:28 +0000 Received: from ns7.gunduz.org ([165.232.104.158]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1trpFE-0028ZW-31 for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 02:21:26 +0000 Received: from dell-laptop07.gunduz.org (104-0-131-52.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [104.0.131.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ns7.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B378D30001DC; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 02:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <425a672c6ca591a0ccee2a5d373764b6b561966f.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: bruno@ioda-net.ch, pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1lvaro?= Herrera Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 05:21:13 +0300 In-Reply-To: <202503101708.hmyugfg4rjpn@alvherre.pgsql> References: <202503101708.hmyugfg4rjpn@alvherre.pgsql> Autocrypt: addr=devrim@gunduz.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=mQINBFN+TjkBEAC6pudhV1V54kHPe91nr6Erz6VuG93VKfcHOHN86yET35s8ytey7f//m 93mW0X6LJUMbY+Z0BztU4EauGAhYRSFzpBWUVBCxaaSyB+l0FR6WtH/Lv6Sxql0GLs6Uhxsk2v3jJ tMtk+hFAW2TJInW0ab1xxwTiiHFmSnJOBEK7IMlOOu5kfOAILgGOgiyMUPsDf5iTIJ35iX9hqFvmz MueFVwAExTeTkKCRXvuGXrO28Bbesy6h4GbJe1bUaTwTMEBn90oQD20UUKI9Lvo46c1SkqF1nOSoQ A3A2eBjWACq68DQ9Q8TbtkBlL8QKftrFz3SL0jth9ZpxyYfm+jiZ5LEAd717YM7qjvH5Yq0juZO3U jz2L9RVgyIF1lTQ33fQEuGn797n7LxdaQSdOYK88yrpABic6fJs6rxGy86HcNVHJQCfxgu+uU4eG9 /wzBKllXreabD2JJXIRjqvhJTXd7JWaF6TZUEUM0SH2GlA6I2G2vGSyRoe0/jaqUIDGm5drzFGkrK 7CwhWzLqxSBlVkCelhOVfDuyit3ypwPhsztTOgZ9w3iwnAPZWuqXbys2Z26H9hQb5eG7xlkCZwlSr mD8mUdHlU5DP84VPIXX6mGCh0I4EJ4ur61CNESpv86BKfGUpbl/3x9XSmcWfvdxB4JnrjHBm9aDIQ ZzukEJGdiGBpQARAQABtCNEZXZyaW0gR8O8bmTDvHogPGRldnJpbUBndW5kdXoub3JnPokCOQQTAQ IAIwUCU35OOQIbAwcLCQgHAwIBBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJENjDPf6Sz261pAgP/j4OJd8 EfBLcdkeYyWKNVV3xN6KGF5tTo5iLjjIBmxmj7403DoigD4qfXY8UQ1hG1e0vTe+zaBuL+fMmn3Rg SAcUcjNUjVwcOeGFIMO0uMDX4xnMeAahjuc+2EKBFBW0UY21aH6BdmM98GkU/gyBpaMt/MC+5Xgsj 1koqlA9vCj1bnDXVNP7w/MPhVsEGbhkBZFB/vwVDVJ0J1U4vA1pr2ggUGOOv0kXu7r7B7nGQgcxN8 qh8QBgfP4ePzbubdA3oGY3PTmRjWWDAzA7HpnKD9pPiAFxvhmnUVcOCdTCo9mNaJc+kRXP7yGbsQa rOWvLMtCvKa0DjFJ6SDY45h3g1XF+Xp/ZMZLbJ7xNc3zEVnBZc0AIvGL+IlQbo9trPdJvjdrFATio UV/cLxug1p4kl8JB6YMvToiKFmMlpQv2wcKK63bm01lDjU93sAy8oZpeKYlOYlN9D0WmyhJbFTlTl IJhMX0aY/xfxUaMYJC5DxV+9s18uviqGWDb2zQR3i3qUbfzV27yHnKo194rUblZ128CzAjs32NerE CLJjKEpc2Ci14fJZz6c6P0J5JTONBKhAzygQi/l97RGBqsLiniJIsTUjGH+hEr7hTnhEg/ZOQSs32 h9vVjhQB7WJ9Xg9A3Frw5mD+W3YkMMM4bFryLTM5p7E1iwGlx+XeM8UMzhtYt Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jOsi155e+Bm+apHixz5u" User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --=-jOsi155e+Bm+apHixz5u Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, 2025-03-10 at 18:08 +0100, =C3=81lvaro Herrera wrote: > This should allow a software build against rhel libpq-devel to be > satisfied with pgdg packaged libpq I don't think so. I think Red Hat adds a small patch to libpq package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libpq/blob/rawhide/f/libpq-12.1-symbol-v= ersioning.patch PGDG packages are PostgreSQL compatible. Red Hat packages are Red Hat compatible. > bareos-dir: /usr/pgsql-14/lib/libpq.so.5: no version information > available (required by /usr/lib64/bareos/libbareossql.so.24) That said, IIRC this message means bareos did not build their packages against our libpq.=20 -HTH Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-jOsi155e+Bm+apHixz5u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJGBAABCAAwFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAmfPnhkSHGRldnJpbUBn dW5kdXoub3JnAAoJENjDPf6Sz2619GcP/iMXQyjIxCo6xH7/kDZ5lGIoa2BduHAr LwY44f44tdN50+oo/qvJxwYyh0E81HNTlag84yPtce91VoNw1LBZ5KO8uu0Nq3Fr d0Bu4QYMByY+NPZInNU7FLoOeaeP39AudgXEfgbPZRSNQFCbT40GKJhCalYsybar Jm/gPCxfrVbR3xVAhBILh1gDpABisUqYNcuJNMK/PuidhFbrKJflf2IGUT0aeQUi 7L3/2ie3x3R+tsvJQcopo0Zp6dJur2KLjHR2bl1ElrRw9jgsly5oMZ8bMzB3XouN 7tlqzEM/jMxXtwVsYRNictDbEf+hSp50gXvwG2k6O367UM60ZDUPLg5JeUuhDpOp suyvC1jhDoAFB4+0fKCdg/EMoIODjqx8YFgHzWm6K/ly9USmiF0WJmjMDOC6juhv PVoFU+CXtF8XQWIrgdm2Ar3eUwDY3kQcZAD3kBpzDBuP+DzHTRboki3CJaKaEXXy ZDbzU2um4/kRdqL/SExRc0na9j/ekrrTyb6MlrzpOaL6eQkgJDi8iVX1/UlfFDZG 1I3SzSk5KyB04K88fYtwtyOvvo0iB4bMBBHkuVWNhq2S8G3K4PLP7D3XVpsgudyN gPYuS73YOtWLvA+B6hI3C7aj5q25RwRsNLEjDiAojZAsw12Xm126BCN6uWRLI4ha 9GyIhlt5oAEI =/HTE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jOsi155e+Bm+apHixz5u--