Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJRZq-0008Sn-KC for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:08:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJRZp-0001Co-Hm for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:08:33 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJRZp-0001Cd-DN for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:08:33 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eJRZk-0007Ac-26 for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:08:32 +0000 Received: from [10.67.189.236] (unknown [176.55.14.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D1343FCE7; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 01:08:22 +0300 (+03) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:08:14 +0000 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <1511366364.3655.8.camel@gunduz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----4W1DLK1RL2TBTLTOW6N5EXGGHCMOCG" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Heads up: Potential PostGIS breakage is coming To: pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org,Daniel Farina From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Devrim_G=FCnd=FCz?= Message-ID: <48482592-9247-4850-B575-B4BAB84C4F44@gunduz.org> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk ------4W1DLK1RL2TBTLTOW6N5EXGGHCMOCG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniel, Thank you for the feedback! Can you please update the packages? I pushed a fix for this last week=2E Regards, Devrim On 27 November 2017 22:04:58 GMT+00:00, Daniel Farina wrote: >On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:59 AM Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz >wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I am about to push PostGIS 2=2E4=2E2-2 packages to 10-testing repos=2E >Unlike the >> other packages, the new packages will depend on proj49 (Proj 4=2E9) and >> geos36 >> (GeOS 3=2E6) packages, which installs to non-standard directories >> (/usr/proj49 >> and /usr/geos36, respectively), so won't conflict with the OS >packages, but >> will use recent versions of Proj and GeOS=2E With this change, we can >> introduce >> GeOS 3=2E7 support to our repo, when it is released=2E >> >> I read some reports about proj 4=2E8 reporting incorrect results, that >> triggered >> this package process=2E >> >> So, I will be happy if someone can test by enabling PG 10 testing >> repository, >> and see if things are broken or not=2E >> >> >I think postgis is not dynamically linking properly to proj=2E It finds >the >path fine when compiling, though=2E Perhaps it, like libproj49 itself in >relation to geos36, requires some ldconfig files=2E --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E ------4W1DLK1RL2TBTLTOW6N5EXGGHCMOCG Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniel,

Thank you for the feedback!

Can you please update the packages? I pushed a fix for this last week=2E
Regards, Devrim

On 27 November 2017 22:0= 4:58 GMT+00:00, Daniel Farina <daniel@citusdata=2Ecom> wrote:

On Wed,= Nov 22, 2017 at 7:59 AM Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz=2Eorg> wrote:

Hi,

I am about to push PostGIS 2=2E4=2E2-2 packages to 10-testing repos=2E Unl= ike the
other packages, the new packages will depend on proj49 (Proj 4=2E9) and ge= os36
(GeOS 3=2E6) packages, which installs to non-standard directories (/usr/pr= oj49
and /usr/geos36, respectively), so won't conflict with the OS packages, bu= t
will use recent versions of Proj and GeOS=2E With this change, we can intr= oduce
GeOS 3=2E7 support to our repo, when it is released=2E

I read some reports about proj 4=2E8 reporting incorrect results, that tri= ggered
this package process=2E

So, I will be happy if someone can test by enabling PG 10 testing reposito= ry,
and see if things are broken or not=2E

=

I think postgis is not dynamically linking properly to proj=2E I= t finds the path fine when compiling, though=2E Perhaps it, like libproj49 = itself in relation to geos36, requires some ldconfig files=2E

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E ------4W1DLK1RL2TBTLTOW6N5EXGGHCMOCG--