Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fS7e7-000430-Mp for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:13:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fS7e6-00086V-QJ for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:13:06 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fS7ah-0004TW-AC for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:09:35 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fS7ae-0006Pq-LC for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:09:34 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop04.gunduz.org (unknown [176.55.5.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A5803FD09; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 21:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9832526bd45a3a39b5ab0c2b92e6a44eb10b1967.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: Merge all versions of postgres From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn_Marqu=E9s?= , pgsql-pkg-yum Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:09:20 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QjFIohBndR53nwafy5nj" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.2 (3.28.2-1.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --=-QjFIohBndR53nwafy5nj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 09:07 -0300, Mart=C3=ADn Marqu=C3=A9s wrote: > We had a exchange of thoughts with a co-worker regarding packaging of > rpm and apt (for some automation of package installation) and one > question we were unable to answer: Why are the pgdg repositories for > rpms separated by version? This allows us to push separate version of a same software for different PostgreSQL versions. This could be solved by renaming all packages, adding postgresql-11- prefix to each piece of package, but no, we are not doing th= at. OTOH, I've been thinking of having a single repo file that includes all rep= os, but not on top my todo list. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-QjFIohBndR53nwafy5nj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAlsdk4AACgkQ2MM9/pLP brV69Q//fdnzhFxmEPUaC2j3S5PEgRJuRk/1K53xXIxD7Zx1EU6fOgE1yKmKg9nj bTbIfdfzXr2pF8wpzCaisFBhYvqdrtO0sZVhgSSIAz1tWyZGol6jaOYaNMuxTQVs eCG+qTflw2FX54i5eyj7+cwVrwGqIs9+NQh94Ri54t7+Mne4SpeAygRfFHh2Rxv7 vWLHMezJnKoqNrYARfn1IOvJa00BU9IRRbtnPFF7vH1EubLUPubH/sMTXF8DQ9yk c+WY2EjBBl6outOB0upbNprv0lnWicAW/TEOtH5drwEUqMGzPA3aLNdp/gwQw/pR WdCNULR0c5t8pJXl8N5hO33ot8JOwMZQcQTrs2lfFWt6E8SO9gkTaV4oALUWPmVs ImksZl++TDpiBy/BsNOcln8FzDHx9zfixRfQs21O97rkfustarlWbCR66BYRbNZg tFeDzZMFOVhhavfZcTOUMkOgbSTw53aGOT2cLqw6cHehODNdRWtjAMp+mGrToQSZ KWYuQsTcpnivUAy0wFXLcnLSGjNXImBO4H6Z5JLenUmvx6K7kV06Q+8JCyNZJK5E n85Y96KgDM8ap4Xaq5FvUQ5jCw6HQtaoHLrSnaNgS2TudpmE17aevHA8b5nELZiz eh2Drj05YEMjhNeTY1djDYjX/VDQ0oO0ZEfaK6vTge3/2G4pIj4= =DGSy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QjFIohBndR53nwafy5nj--