Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7HHe-0006QU-Vd for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:48:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7HHd-0007O3-Hs for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:48:01 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7HHd-0007Nw-9x for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:48:01 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7HHW-0005zM-8s for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:48:00 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop04.gunduz.org (unknown [176.235.159.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 359F83FCA7; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9f4be12bc5d34f177b06adbee5092a044fa586c7.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: Looking for an older PG 10.0 rpm for Centos 7.X 64bit From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Kathy Taylor , pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 12:47:50 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ylK23eouvw8h6Ras99Ws" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-1.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --=-ylK23eouvw8h6Ras99Ws Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 11:24 -0700, Kathy Taylor wrote: > I need to find an rpm for Postgresql server 10.0, not 10.5.=20 We only store last 2 minor releases of the package, so we only have 10.5 an= d 10.4.=20 Also, +1 to what Stephen wrote. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-ylK23eouvw8h6Ras99Ws Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAluzPsYACgkQ2MM9/pLP brWO8w/+MCKekTTdnLYKRAVYkS60qYQtSe1d4qMujZ7aVzTC4KQJF4Zb1Kdd8IZE 1N3ediPr9yb/WcsMVENtrAKCIeT5ESTdkLAZ+25GX0DzCJBC4H8LeMFhQxoHuDAq cY/7e+sh9F+kITmQnEUnM21F62pQNrUd22pg7qosyQxLeeCtHwZAw+8GQhScGLNG 7YbgZE1S+sJHGgM+Z0GqKWwZMK7w0gHEqjGjHG+sW57my14Lxd+QrJxKjTEOxf7p LgUC4srN3UZgNRLXzkDGR8o8GhrorMk6ZOjxDHeY80WAv9N4zUts/H7CGMJSvWp5 XU2LJXejSoYMNiLe/OebE7sawxy+hY+n4e9JiE/KvhmCzUdSzmFWQIcWjZdrVssN pa2LVcU/KuoF9rZThE5scOuwW2KOTPJtGXFNsH1mkDnJbk12s2Ls90oHbsOr2ODi 9i9ad/MvPMb4vOgta1A6oKJcFrI7f6f/wIVXz6sAGl1o5uVw4vJu7LeTyb3WqUcQ A8Y8mYsKRU2J5VLsrLoZ0pBPFUDQlmZBYdJJd4rYOw3sEBDJtMWsle1dosE4qwBu 0RdOEBbeNx7uaznKd9mb8xLVlBca7dgo8H/yULWqB+HXQWsYNEGKrv2xFHTYLPDh uOmXapJnT7adlQON/Ve/23bD9Ajdxcq5vp/APXQC3kUWN1L5umI= =HIoY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ylK23eouvw8h6Ras99Ws--