Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
From: Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com>
In-Reply-To: <1468336162.30929.22.camel@gunduz.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:14:09 -0700
Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AE47425B-AD18-499E-B4C9-208EBDA534B8@pgexperts.com>
References: <1468336162.30929.22.camel@gunduz.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Devrim_G=C3=9CND=C3=9CZ?= <devrim@gunduz.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-pkg-yum-owner@postgresql.org


> On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz <devrim@gunduz.org> =
wrote:
>=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> I was reading this:
>=20
> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1444
>=20
> Any objections for switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? From packaging poin=
t of
> view, I confirmed that c-ares is available for all supported distros, but=
 I'm
> not sure about the implications.

If the chart is to be believed, the only issue is:

ipv6+CNAME buggy in <=3D1.10

Do you know which versions are standard in the supported distros these days?

--=20
Sent via pgsql-pkg-yum mailing list (pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-yum