public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
sysupdates yum repos are gone
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* sysupdates yum repos are gone
@ 2025-12-25 05:16 Ruohang Feng <[email protected]>
  2025-12-25 13:13 ` Re: sysupdates yum repos are gone Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Ruohang Feng @ 2025-12-25 05:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]

Hi Devrim and the PGDG RPM team,

First of all, thank you for your continued efforts in maintaining the PostgreSQL YUM repository.

I'm writing to inquire about the status of the sysupdates yum repositories. We've noticed that these repositories are now returning 404 errors, and I wanted to understand whether this is an intentional change or a temporary issue.

Observed behavior:

The following repository URLs are returning 404:

https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/common/pgdg-centos8-sysupdates/redhat/rhel-8-x86_64/re...

https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/common/pgdg-rocky9-sysupdates/redhat/rhel-9-x86_64/rep...

The howto page at https://yum.postgresql.org/howto/ still references the sysupdates repository, stating it "distributes LLVM and CLANG packages for Rocky Linux / AlmaLinux for the times when RHEL releases a minor update and clones need to take some time to catch up."

The repository definitions still exist in /etc/yum.repos.d/pgdg-redhat-all.repo (from pgdg-redhat-repo-42.0-63), causing dnf update to report errors when these repos are enabled.

Search engine caches suggest the pgdg-centos8-sysupdates directory existed as recently as May 2025, containing packages like clang-19.1.7.

Questions:

Have the sysupdates repositories been intentionally removed or deprecated?

If so, is there an alternative approach now recommended for Rocky/AlmaLinux users who need updated LLVM/Clang packages during the RHEL minor version lag period?

Should users simply disable these repository definitions in their configurations going forward?

Thank you for your time and for all the work you do for the PostgreSQL community and happy holidays 

Best regards,
Ruohang Feng, Vonng

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: sysupdates yum repos are gone
  2025-12-25 05:16 sysupdates yum repos are gone Ruohang Feng <[email protected]>
@ 2025-12-25 13:13 ` Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Devrim Gündüz @ 2025-12-25 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ruohang Feng <[email protected]>; [email protected]

Hi,

On Thu, 2025-12-25 at 13:16 +0800, Ruohang Feng wrote:
> I'm writing to inquire about the status of the sysupdates yum
> repositories. We've noticed that these repositories are now returning
> 404 errors, and I wanted to understand whether this is an intentional
> change or a temporary issue.

This is an intentional change. Removed them in full (see below)


> The howto page at https://yum.postgresql.org/howto/ still references
> the sysupdates repository, stating it "distributes LLVM and CLANG
> packages for Rocky Linux / AlmaLinux for the times when RHEL releases
> a minor update and clones need to take some time to catch up."

Sorry about that, forgot to remove mention to sysupdates repo from
there. Fixed.

> 
> The repository definitions still exist in /etc/yum.repos.d/pgdg-
> redhat-all.repo (from pgdg-redhat-repo-42.0-63), causing dnf update to
> report errors when these repos are enabled.

Are you sure? I removed them along with -62. Can you please check if you
have an pgdg-redhat-all.repo.rpmnew file under /etc/yum.repos.d or not?

> 
> Questions:
> 
> Have the sysupdates repositories been intentionally removed or
> deprecated?

Yes. See this news item for details:

https://yum.postgresql.org/news/postgresql-rpms-multiple-rhel-minor-versions/

> 
> If so, is there an alternative approach now recommended for
> Rocky/AlmaLinux users who need updated LLVM/Clang packages during the
> RHEL minor version lag period?

We now support multiple RHEL minor versions, so this is not a problem
anymore.

> 
> Should users simply disable these repository definitions in their
> configurations going forward?
> 

Again, latest repo RPMs do not have those.


> Thank you for your time and for all the work you do for the PostgreSQL
> community and happy holidays 

You are welcome. Happy holidays!

Regards,

-- 
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org


Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (858B, 2-signature.asc)
  download

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-25 13:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-25 05:16 sysupdates yum repos are gone Ruohang Feng <[email protected]>
2025-12-25 13:13 ` Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox