Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dFUq4-0001Th-TF for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 00:16:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dFUq4-00027b-Fw for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 00:16:44 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dFSm1-0006it-2r for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 22:04:25 +0000 Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dFSlv-0000su-SI for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 22:04:23 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f102so46786904ioi.2 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:04:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=schibsted-com-mx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GTbj0i8hlB1CrRRIW2/JyAiG4vGFVOFm4OSmpkwHi9I=; b=zn5Wcw7yKQ40TPAhcbwqAOtrLLK11gL52YNqhuWbcrUrMuoqixLNMut+1rzgLJkksR Gks8cDKawjV70MoOE7w7WkG43zpBG/8NszkMPpEGXe24PmrYoQ8NM45VDwHJROb4rJnZ TAIa5AZcKS8OeU+WeEQGrBpu/QBxK1cVqh1CVc+3xSs6BsBzGNfOCPqv9zHmpl38lRwq w7X/RnPvwwO1ZXqZzYexwVidSylng7OGpDvnc7ftQSkmCsDtvB7m/yI1QRJxOBDrAUWz W3XlGs5IRj7+ExGnPpvrgwDLREFl/pAVlcHw6v/9IajCdb38Z/rubADjX7Or8j1yVqcz hZGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GTbj0i8hlB1CrRRIW2/JyAiG4vGFVOFm4OSmpkwHi9I=; b=Z5dge8Y8g1g9xAkkgUraWmQh7KjQpCleWgMtJK42st3N47Sr/9HV3Yg90Sl+CWcpfW QucXKTaimmyhcLQhgq46Qxr3TXTfnQEPaZvRJcCsl+M5HQOKHVoUilKXGXPuDJgmwMMQ LjvUhbvKmv1xmZfYVHbjnTrgg0fEPMuyLjWCV3NFkUN+cKcHn0q8AjZIcdQ7uTAae43i OFnH9uqJHwNWWwnBKYPmo4EvzIeSRha7tFRCz9dJ0Y/DUjj5VwNZGzGEDs+HMcGJgFqj FntSYKAc8Lw5goiml6Hy4XqWGV2kPWaM1T2ytq4JXzhkVq1Eg4vUy9oiiaza7gCM6jDA 0jbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDmEKjHNxWDD+nvzbH271H3gitq0e4xNitfZBfOJWvdnQzwETza D6z8zOth8PLDPYeCBBpiRl+IWV/8oTIVLhs= X-Received: by 10.107.157.67 with SMTP id g64mr14320388ioe.48.1496095458508; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:04:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.159.23 with HTTP; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:04:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Ivan Californias Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 17:04:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Problem with packages for RHEL 6 To: pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140cd1e5ad4840550b0deeb" X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-yum Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-yum-owner@postgresql.org --001a1140cd1e5ad4840550b0deeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi there, I want to report a problem with packages laying under the *rhel-6.*-x86_64* directory, the packages seem that they were built for RHEL7 not for RHEL6. I noticed this while trying to install postgresql93-libs and postgresql93 packages in a Centos 6.9 instance but this error came up: Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) is needed by postgresql93-libs-9.3.17-1PGDG.rhel7.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) is needed by postgresql93-9.3.17-1PGDG.rhel7.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.15)(64bit) is needed by postgresql93-9.3.17-1PGDG.rhel7.x86_64 Then I noticed the "rhel7" part of the package name, So the error was reasonable as in Centos6.9 at most (unless manual upgrade), it uses glibc 2.12 then I assumed these packages are for RHEL7 indeed, and not just a typo on the package name as I initially thought. After that I checked if there was any custom configuration pointing to a wrong repo, but there wasn't any. I ended up checking at the postgres yum repo at https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/9.3/redhat/ and I did find out that within *rhel-6.*-x86_64* directories contain packages for RHEL7. This is true for versions 9.3,9.4,9.5,9.6, as those were the only ones I checked. Hope you can find the root cause of this, and hope that is something really trivial. If I can help you in any way I'll be pleased to do so. Best Regards Ivan --001a1140cd1e5ad4840550b0deeb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi there,

I want to= report a problem with packages laying under the=C2=A0rhel-6.*-x86_64=C2=A0directory, the packages s= eem that they were built for RHEL7 not for RHEL6. I noticed this while tryi= ng to install postgresql93-libs and postgresql93 packages in a Centos 6.9 i= nstance but this error came up:


Downlo= ading Packages:
Runnin= g rpm_check_debug
ERRO= R with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) is needed by postgresql93-libs-9= .3.17-1PGDG.rhel7.x86_64
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) is needed by postgresql93-9.3.17-1PGDG.rhel= 7.x86_64
libc.so.6(GLI= BC_2.15)(64bit) is needed by postgresql93-9.3.17-1PGDG.rhel7.x86_64<= /div>


Then I noticed the "rhel= 7" part of the package name, So the error was reasonable as in Centos6= .9 at most (unless manual upgrade), it uses glibc 2.12 then I assumed these= packages are for RHEL7 indeed, and not just a typo on the package name as = I initially thought. After that I checked if there was any custom configura= tion pointing to a wrong repo, but there wasn't any. I ended up checkin= g at the postgres yum repo at https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/9.3/= redhat/ and I did find out that within rhel-6.*-x86_64 directories contain packages for RHEL7. T= his is true for versions 9.3,9.4,9.5,9.6, as those were the only ones I che= cked.

Hope you can find the root cause of this, an= d hope that is something really trivial. If I can help you in any way I'= ;ll be pleased to do so.

Best Regards
Iv= an
--001a1140cd1e5ad4840550b0deeb--