public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: M, Anbazhagan <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 04:13:43 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR06MB6637E038DE9087619FBAF82CFF7DA@MN2PR06MB6637.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
We noticed that all newly uploaded packages under the RHEL 8 repos like rhel-8.8/rhel-8.9/rhel-8.10 etc. contain 8.10 in the package name, regardless of the actual minor version of that repo.
Could you confirm if this is intentional or if the package should reflect specific RHEL 8 minor version in their names?
Example:
https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64/ contains rpm named as [postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhel8.10.x86_64.rpm]
(https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64/postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhe...)
Anbazhagan M
Staff Engineer, Technical Operations
Instaclustr by Netapp
NetApp
+91-8056005329 Mobile Phone
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[NetApp logo]<https://www.netapp.com/;
[A white face with black eyes Description automatically generated]<https://netappdiscord.com/;[A black background with a black square Description automatically generated with medium confidence]<https://www.facebook.com/NetApp;[NetApp on Instagram]<https://www.instagram.com/netapp/;[NetApp on LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/netapp/;[NetApp on YouTube]<https://www.youtube.com/netapp;[NetApp on X]<https://twitter.com/NetApp;
Attachments:
[image/jpeg] image001.jpg (27.4K, 3-image001.jpg)
download | view image
[image/png] image002[76].png (1.8K, 4-image002%5B76%5D.png)
download | view image
[image/png] image003.png (1.3K, 5-image003.png)
download | view image
[image/png] image004.png (2.8K, 6-image004.png)
download | view image
[image/png] image005.png (1.7K, 7-image005.png)
download | view image
[image/png] image006.png (1.6K, 8-image006.png)
download | view image
[image/png] image007.png (2.3K, 9-image007.png)
download | view image
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR06MB6637E038DE9087619FBAF82CFF7DA@MN2PR06MB6637.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox