Message-ID: <c7a4c6fb62e6eef089af4083637b312656606b36.camel@gunduz.org>
Subject: Re: SV: SV: gdal30 and Rhel 8.4 dependency problem
From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= <devrim@gunduz.org>
To: Svensson Peter <peter.svensson@smhi.se>, "pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org"
	 <pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 08:13:34 +0100
In-Reply-To: <a2c0de25e80d4f6a8004482763a97293@smhi.se>
References: <fff8cc1b678740f481a591fe4d34fbf4@smhi.se>
	 ,<1edea83ca7961b8f7d22ca59e421f9e680054031.camel@gunduz.org>
	 <0dc16e0e3b7c4b0492012081ba6b3dcd@smhi.se>
	,<b0a4fe4d98f3d63566f39139aec2d86dd4e508b9.camel@gunduz.org>
	 <a2c0de25e80d4f6a8004482763a97293@smhi.se>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PCAkuXCiXXwLYeS8xkdK"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.1 (3.40.1-1.fc34) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c7a4c6fb62e6eef089af4083637b312656606b36.camel%40gunduz.org>
Precedence: bulk


--=-PCAkuXCiXXwLYeS8xkdK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi,

On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 06:23 +0000, Svensson Peter wrote:
> We use in this combination=C2=A0 proj70 , geos38 and postgis24

Ahh, that now makes sense (see below) .=20

> But gdal30 requires libproj.so.19()(64bit)=C2=A0 so I think even proj72 w=
ill
> work.

My very original plan was to support a single GeOS/GDAL/PROJ
combination across all PostGIS installations, which miserably failed
after PROJ 8.0:

checking for proj_api.h... no
configure: error: could not find proj_api.h - you may need to specify
the directory of a PROJ.4 installation using --with-projdir

Upstream patched 3.0 and 3.1 for that, and that is why users of the
recent versions actually have no issues.


> and gdal30-libs requires libgeos_c.so.1()(64bit)=C2=A0 so even geos39 are
> possible
>=20
> postgis24 requires libgdal.so.26()(64bit)

I even removed gdal30 spec files from pgdg repos a few months ago :-)=20

Let me see what I can do. Either I will solve the problem on the
packaging side, or will just as users to add these packages to
exclude=3D... list, so that yum/dnf update won't complain.

Regards,
--=20
Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

--=-PCAkuXCiXXwLYeS8xkdK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=y4xx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-PCAkuXCiXXwLYeS8xkdK--