Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcZy6-0001t5-Oc for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:10:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcZy5-0004ZN-OG for pgsql-pkg-yum@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:10:17 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcZy5-0004ZG-Jj for pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:10:17 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcZy3-0001FF-4f for pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:10:17 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop04.gunduz.org (unknown [31.14.249.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CFAD3FD0C; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: python3-barman missing gpg signature From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Cameron Murdoch , "pgsql-pkg-yum@postgresql.org" Cc: "postgres-core@usit.uio.no" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:10:09 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KSr/m/hA5/3HgWJgPLAj" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1 (3.38.1-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --=-KSr/m/hA5/3HgWJgPLAj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 07:51 +0000, Cameron Murdoch wrote: >=20 > As of today it looks like python3-barman from pgdb-common is not > signed. Unless I'm missing something :-) >=20 > Tested on RHEL 8.3 and Fedora 33. Sorry for the delay, fixed. Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-KSr/m/hA5/3HgWJgPLAj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAl+q86EACgkQ2MM9/pLP brUt8w//Z+zbSLe4jVKgTNvrPWko8EaqjT6rPGFimuUK8i4U9MmQtQd3fK+obdYa aVyXlg/pZxV2oqv0RNgDeu2txO2+1KZLXXJ9drOhZfpjZHpIICYIEhnYpsdZmB3p azSX1bfcqoLTgq3u6R4pOuUQxjlzX4ViOq3xN+ElhwDRJbZLyOsl2Dchw4dXVOuy VjIe3JnCHjd0wChQrLxLWs4m56iNHnDKuuHFpNcH/82nFs3tgAYTb8OBDfluCOhu S8GOOcfdyLQkb5mCx9WOuBd3RsUsZtpDCkokNisFZlRj/28T9Y4ZYDuhcYa53DHc zC0DxUrG9tqK1IK2qooNK9llDR+p2Wt9+L4RzHmYd3FIBWpm3UDyLfLOEGxdhpd6 1GJ+79ckdekECquKdPUEB4c36RmRfIbTSkwT+6fqDVkGNqNoxpe7+6wI0Iq7d1dA xBiF50a7AllRvy7fo+/R6UwlIJnhFlCI5cFOZ6wApvwPD2cX5ARjflPpCTyKu1/F 7mlbwiWpz92wv08elxKGdXYpi/VVe3LFksyEXxAClrQKiYZWtN5e7R4Vp3V2Ies4 foRVzpfz92mNdAiGqBqbHP6bffPlJT8/oA+la28O/+El4lTZEJr0bgDFAJdmPk9e e07vAF1g0IZh3rp8uPzMLOKAZjYVD21c4hZH2qRvdXnlVjlGDHA= =2VhM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KSr/m/hA5/3HgWJgPLAj--