Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360C1475925
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:53:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.65.60])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C8E3474E44
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:53:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 9637 invoked by uid 0); 26 Nov 2002 12:53:33 -0000
Received: from pd951649b.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO wxp) (217.81.100.155)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 12:53:33 -0000
Message-ID: <002801c2954b$2833e290$a07ba8c0@wxp>
From: "Albrecht Berger" <berger1517@gmx.ch>
To: "pgsql" <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Inheritance in SQL99  ?
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:55:51 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200211/366
X-Sequence-Number: 10508

Hello,
is the inheritance of tables specified in the SQL99 standard, 
or is this a postgresql "add-on" ?

Does anybody know when the primary key bug, which is
documented in the docs,  of this feature will be fixed ?

Thx
berger