Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FC947611A
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:19:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D81D7476108
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:19:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 10689 invoked by uid 0); 25 Sep 2002 20:19:24 -0000
Received: from chello062178186201.1.15.tuwien.teleweb.at (HELO beeblebrox)
	(62.178.186.201)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp006-rz3) with SMTP; 25 Sep 2002 20:19:24 -0000
Message-ID: <02b701c264d1$1f3e6340$4201a8c0@beeblebrox>
From: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
References: <3D8F3775.B5DD079@nsd.ca> <28749.1032797034@www55.gmx.net>
	<11493.1032973923@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: Getting current transaction id 
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:21:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200209/319
X-Sequence-Number: 9596

Tom Lane wrote:


> Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes:
[snip]
> > If it's not working I will have to implement my own transactions table.
> 
> That's what I'd recommend.  Transaction IDs are internal to the database
> and are not designed for users to rely on.
> 
> regards, tom lane

Well, after reading your explanation I agree with you that it is better
to have my own transaction table. I appreciate your detailed response.

Thanks very much!

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold