Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C954476E6E for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:48:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51FE476E6C for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:48:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gA1JlihR001009; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:47:44 -0500 (EST) To: Wei Weng Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: FIFO Queue Problems In-reply-to: <1036178317.23296.2.camel@Monet> References: <20021101145630.50886.qmail@web13801.mail.yahoo.com> <26900.1036169461@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1036178317.23296.2.camel@Monet> Comments: In-reply-to Wei Weng message dated "01 Nov 2002 14:18:37 -0500" Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 14:47:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1008.1036180064@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/17 X-Sequence-Number: 10159 Wei Weng writes: > Do you need to unlock the table fifo when you are done? That happens at COMMIT. regards, tom lane