Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67151476BFA
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:07:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mta4.snet.net (mta4.snet.net [204.60.203.76])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1B4475A68
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:27:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pop.snet.net (pop.snet.net [204.60.203.72])
	by mta4.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-mx-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with
	ESMTP id g5JJQsHH000620
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:26:54 -0400 (EDT)
X-Originating-IP: [64.252.95.167]
X-SBCIS-MTA: [pop.snet.net]
Received: from [192.168.1.83] (167.95.252.64.snet.net [64.252.95.167])
	by pop.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-pop-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with
	ESMTP id g5JJQxkY026243
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:26:59 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Which one is faster?
From: Wei Weng <wweng@kencast.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 (1.0.5-4) 
Date: 19 Jun 2002 15:27:01 -0400
Message-Id: <1024514821.20296.5.camel@Monet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Archive-Number: 200206/254
X-Sequence-Number: 8219

Between Using Limit P, S or using a cursor to start from FETCH ABSOLUTE
S and FETCH NEXT for P times, which one is faster?

Thanks!

-- 
Wei Weng
Network Software Engineer
KenCast Inc.