Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E44A475813
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:21:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mta5.snet.net (mta5.snet.net [204.60.203.77])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E014475807
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:21:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pop.snet.net (pop.snet.net [204.60.203.72])
	by mta5.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-mx-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with
	ESMTP id g7CNIYt0008956
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:18:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Originating-IP: [64.252.95.167]
X-SBCIS-MTA: [pop.snet.net]
Received: from [192.168.1.83] (167.95.252.64.snet.net [64.252.95.167])
	by pop.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-pop-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with
	ESMTP id g7CNLRT0001053
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:21:27 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Is this valid?
From: Wei Weng <wweng@kencast.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 12 Aug 2002 19:21:29 -0400
Message-Id: <1029194489.28129.3.camel@Monet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200208/189
X-Sequence-Number: 9035

I am not sure if this is the right mailing list I talk to. Please let me
know if I had violated any unwritten rules. :)

I have a global variable PGconn* m_pgconn that is the connection handle
for connecting to the postgresql database. Can I access/use the handle
from multiple threads? Say I have a thread that does some insertion
through this handle/database connection(m_pgconn) and also another
thread that do some insertion *on the same table* through this
handle(m_pgconn), will that break?

Thanks


-- 
Wei Weng
Network Software Engineer
KenCast Inc.