Subject: Re: Please include hier-patch in next PostgreSQL version
From: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
To: Boris Klug <boris.klug@control.de>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org,
	PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <200301271605.30888.boris.klug@control.de>
References: <200301271605.30888.boris.klug@control.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-Z/bqeNTENyN00EkTo6eX"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1043846257.76461.123.camel@jester>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 29 Jan 2003 08:17:37 -0500

--=-Z/bqeNTENyN00EkTo6eX
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 10:05, Boris Klug wrote:
> Hello!
>=20
> I want to say that it would be fantastic when you include the Oracle like=
=20
> "CONNECT BY" patch (see gppl.terminal.ru/readme.html) in the next version=
 of=20
> PostgreSQL.
> It is very usefull for people that have to handle such kind of hierarchic=
al=20
> data.

Yes, very useful -- but use the SQL 99 syntax for recursive queries and
not the wonky Oracle version.  It's more flexible.

Looking forward to the patch ;)
=20
--=20
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

--=-Z/bqeNTENyN00EkTo6eX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQA+N9Rw6DETLow6vwwRAtMXAJ9gVIXx5qX8kUPGrA+9h3buX1jLFACeLQa4
OWQ4I4QKBf/GgxNicRO4hb4=
=8mXD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Z/bqeNTENyN00EkTo6eX--