X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B072D1B8DA for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:58:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07653-02 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:57:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ns1.keycomm.it (ns1.keycomm.it [62.152.33.7]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C52D1BA42 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:57:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from osts (ip-a1-37118.keycomm.it [62.152.37.118]) by ns1.keycomm.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E2F1B584 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:57:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Bug on parameter bigint in PL/PGSQL From: Michele Bendazzoli To: pgsql Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Micky Mouse Message-Id: <1061553594.781.34.camel@mickymouse.sintel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:59:54 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200308/270 X-Sequence-Number: 14886 I think i found a bug in PL/PGSQL: when i use a parameter bigint (int8) and call the function from psql an error message which says that "the functioname(bigint) doesn't exist" is displayed. If i turn the int8 to int4 all works fine ... Now i use two int4 instead of one int8: is advisable? ciao, Michele