X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC85853C9E for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:25:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37176-05 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:25:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BE253BEC for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:25:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3L3PBdF010798; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:25:12 -0400 (EDT) To: weigelt@metux.de Cc: pgsql-sql Subject: Re: checking pgsql functions In-reply-to: <20050421023537.GB16782@nibiru.borg.metux.de> References: <20050421023537.GB16782@nibiru.borg.metux.de> Comments: In-reply-to Enrico Weigelt message dated "Thu, 21 Apr 2005 04:35:37 +0200" Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:25:11 -0400 Message-ID: <10797.1114053911@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.007 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/310 X-Sequence-Number: 21203 Enrico Weigelt writes: > Is it possible to check plpgsql functions before they're actually > into the database, as it's done w/ sql functions ? 8.0 does a little bit of this, and 8.1 will do more... regards, tom lane