X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9EBD1B198
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:08:31 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 03804-10
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:08:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailer.ipsoluciones.com (unknown [213.0.106.89])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF87D1B184
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:08:26 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from [192.168.2.140] ([192.168.2.140])
	by mailer.ipsoluciones.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	i5U86Xkv029492; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:06:34 +0200
Subject: Re: Unrecognized node type
From: Alvaro Sanchez-Mariscal <mariscal@javahispano.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <1624.1088525897@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <1087916170.2821.23.camel@mariscal>
 <1624.1088525897@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Organization: javaHispano
Message-Id: <1088582895.31782.58.camel@mariscal>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:08:15 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IPSoluciones-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
	information
X-IPSoluciones-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-IPSoluciones-MailScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam,
	SpamAssassin (puntuación=-4.9, requerido 5, BAYES_00 -4.90)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Non-encoded 8-bit data (char F3 hex) in message
	header 'X-IPSoluciones-MailScanner-SpamCheck'
	X-IPSoluciones-MailScanner-SpamCheck: ...am,
	\n\tSpamAssassin (puntuaci\363n=-4.9, requeri... ^
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200407/11
X-Sequence-Number: 18263

> I suppose there's some other factor involved in the problem that
> you didn't show us.

But... what? :-S

> As far as finding the bug, you need to provide a complete,
> self-contained test case.

Can you be more explicit?

> As far as loading the schema, how about just removing the DEFAULT
> clauses?  "default null" is the default behavior anyway.

I tried this, but then EJB's doesn't work...

Thanks.

-- 
Álvaro Sánchez-Mariscal Arnaiz  | Departamento de Comunicación
   mariscal@javahispano.org     |         javaHispano

      javaHispano. Una Comunidad al Servicio de Todos
                   www.javaHispano.org