X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9019DD1B446 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:05:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46457-09 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:05:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web11.manitu.net (web11.manitu.net [217.11.48.111]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7963ED1B381 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:04:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [62.165.4.166] (dicaprio.akademie1.de [62.165.4.166]) (authenticated) by web11.manitu.net (8.10.2-SOL3/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i6LE4gf24768 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:04:42 +0200 Subject: immutable function calling stable function From: Markus Bertheau To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1090418677.3239.23.camel@dicaprio.akademie1.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:04:37 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/151 X-Sequence-Number: 18403 Hi, shouldn't it be illegal for an immutable function to call a stable one? -- Markus Bertheau