Subject: Re: reply to setting
From: Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>,
	Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <411A8561.8060006@joeconway.com>
References: <0408070933080K.01190@thenilgiris.com>
	<20040811191321.GA14350@wolff.to>  <411A8561.8060006@joeconway.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1092259114.16087.80.camel@jester>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:18:35 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > faster than ones sent through the lists. It is also possible that the direct
> > replies might be handled differently by the recipient (e.g. a filter may put
> > them in different folders).
> 
> This is very true. In fact, I get mildly annoyed when people *don't* 
> include the direct reply to me, because I very actively filter/redirect 

If you don't want duplicates, send an email to majordomo@postgresql.org
with the following command (or something similar to this anyway):

	set pgsql-hackers eliminatecc

Whenever you're in the To: or Cc: headers, the list will not send you a
copy of the message -- so you only receive it once.